Showing posts with label Topics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Topics. Show all posts

Comp Plan Environmental Summary

See the full 2045 Comp Plan at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3275/2045-Comprehensive-Plan 

See the Chesapeake Sustainability Network comments on the plan at https://www.greeningchesapeake.com/2025/07/chesapeake-comp-plan.html

See local area plans at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/564/Long-Range-Planning-Policy

Jump to Plan Policy Overview:

  • Connectivity - Complete Streets, Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity, Public Transit
  • Infrastructure: Utilities
  • Economic Prosperity: Underperforming Commercial Properties, Data Centers, Brownfields
  • Environment and Resilience: Wetlands, Living Shorelines, Riparian Buffers, Green Infrastructure, Sea Level Rise, Flooding, Environmental Justice, Trees, Wildlife Habitat, Waste Reduction, Energy Policy
  • Growth Management and Rural Areas: Agricultural and Environmental Sensitive Land, Redirect Higher Density Development
  • Housing: Energy Efficiency, Affordability
  • Placemaking: Preserve developments’ natural spaces, Encourage walkable, mixed-use, and people-oriented development, Light Pollution, Noise Pollution, Parking Minimums, Wildlife Crossing, Streescaping and Landscaping, Native Plants
  • Quality of Life: Natural Amenities, Parks, Water Access
Connectivity

CON 1: The City will move people with an efficient multi-modal transportation system that reflects the local users and development patterns.

CON 3: Consider the priorities of automobiles, cyclists, and pedestrians when designing roadways based on the land use and development patterns and the user needs and preferences.

CON 4: Make connections between streets and neighborhoods to improve safety, efficiency, and community design. Avoid culde-sacs where possible.

CON 6: Develop a Complete Streets policy, which will look different across different areas of the City and under different development circumstances.

Complete Streets: This is an approach to transportation planning that provides streets that are safe, comfortable, and accessible for all users regardless of age and ability. There is no single design for complete streets; each one is unique and responds to its community context. A complete street may include sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use paths, dedicated bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops and shelters, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, and more. A complete street in a rural area will look different from a complete street in an urban area, but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road.

CON 7: Adopt a traffic safety plan that sets a goal to reduce/eliminate traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries. 

CON 14: Invest in an interconnected, alternative transportation network throughout the City.

CON 15: Develop a multi-modal hub policy to set goals to provide equitable connections for micromobility, transit, active transportation, and roadway users.

CON 16: Provide a safe, efficient, and equitable active transportation network for all travelers regardless of age, income, ability, race, where they live, or how they choose to travel. The network should connect all of Chesapeake and be accessible to everyone.

CON 17: Implement the Trails & Connectivity Plan to develop an integrated active transportation network and to design active transportation facilities

CON 18: Incorporate active transportation facilities within new developments and City projects, particularly when connections can be made to the following: existing or future Trails & Connectivity facilities, existing and future neighborhoods, commercial areas, open spaces, waterways and water access points, public facilities (schools, libraries, community centers, etc.), transit routes, and regional and national trail networks.

CON 19: Consider active transportation facilities in the design of all future roadway improvements, both public and private, based upon location, destination, context and their proximity to a facility depicted on the Trails & Connectivity Plan.

CON 20: If a roadway connection is not feasible, encourage active transportation connections between private developments.

CON 21: Use public utility corridors and infrastructure easements for active transportation facilities when feasible.

CON 22: Develop a safety campaign that educates all users on appropriate use of roadways and other facilities.

CON 23: Encourage additional bicycle infrastructure in new developments.

CON 24: Prioritize closing existing sidewalk gaps and installing crosswalks that create connections to schools, parks, senior activity centers, transit stops, and other pedestrian generators. 

CON 25: Provide and maintain sidewalks giving priority to projects based on the City’s Sidewalk Project Evaluation Guide. 

CON 26: During the site plan review process, require sidewalk installation on all existing and proposed road frontages in the Urban and Suburban Overlay districts as development and redevelopment occurs. 

CON 27: Applicants should proffer and/ or staff should stipulate the installation of new sidewalks or improvement of existing, substandard sidewalks that create connections between communities and key destinations such as schools, retail, parks, public transportation, and City services. 

CON 28: Include safe intersection crossing and necessary public improvements when designing sidewalk connections.

CON 29: Encourage increased development along public transportation routes to both serve more residents and bolster the use of such services. 

CON 30: Work with HRT to review existing and potential transit stops in order to maximize ridership and understand the barriers to their success. Prioritize and create safe connections between public transportation stops and activity centers. 

CON 31: As development occurs along existing or proposed transit lines, set aside required space and build required infrastructure to support HRT installation of standard bus stops, passenger amenities, and micromobility corrals. 

CON 32: Continue to work with HRT to assess the feasibility of high-capacity transit based on existing and future anticipated land use conditions. 

CON 33: Evaluate demand responsive services, like microtransit, as an option to fill in public transit gaps, particularly in suburban and rural areas where fixed-route service is not feasible.

CON 36: Acquire abandoned railroad right-of-way the City has legal claim to or that railroad companies are interested in disposing of for public use.

Infrastructure

INF 2: Encourage and facilitate utilities being located or moved underground, particularly when work is being done near existing utilities

INF 3: Prioritize areas of visual importance for retroactive undergrounding utility projects.

INF 6: Coordinate with utility providers to plan for future utility corridor and infrastructure expansions.

INF 9: Apply additional scrutiny and require additional hydrology information as needed when a proposed development would likely alter hydrology (such as borrow pits).

INF 10: Review volumetric capacity and request additional information as needed when a proposed development may consume large amounts of water and potentially impact the flow of water in the City’s distribution system.

Economic Prosperity

ECON 6: Prioritize repositioning large underperforming commercial properties, such as shopping malls, into mixed-use developments that increase pedestrian activity.

ECON 11: Study and make recommendations on potential siting criteria and sample stipulations for data centers.

ECON 19: Identify and assess the viability of existing brownfields for cleanup and reuse.

Environment and Resilience

ENV 1: Protect, maintain, and improve the quality of the natural environment and increase the opportunities for green infrastructure and nature-based solutions, while also protecting residents and structures from natural hazards.

ENV 2: Protect wetlands in all future development to the maximum extent practicable; developers should provide information on the purpose and need of wetlands impacts, avoidance and minimization measures taken during design to avoid wetland impacts, and what wetland mitigation options are being considered to provide no net loss of wetlands function and value. 

ENV 3: Living shorelines are the preferred method for stabilizing eroding shorelines and must be the first design alternative considered for shoreline projects. Project managers should refer to the Comprehensive Coastal Resource Management Guide prepared by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science for further direction on preferred shoreline design. 

ENV 4: Protect riparian vegetation, particularly where continuous stretches can be maintained, and preserve natural topography, providing opportunities for vegetation to migrate and adapt landward as sea levels rise. 

ENV 5: Partner with non-profit and academic organizations to identify sites where wetlands rehabilitation and restoration are possible.

ENV 6: Protect water bodies that are sources of drinking water from potential contamination. 

ENV 7: Establish and maintain an adequate vegetated buffer around all source waters. 

ENV 8: Maintain a water source protection plan. 

ENV 9: Avoid land uses that can potentially contaminate the City’s source waters. When necessary, these land uses should be placed away from bodies of water and have significant vegetated buffers and other protections. 

ENV 10: Work with the Virginia Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Quality to proactively monitor groundwater and to develop strategies to address concerns.

ENV 11: Adopt and follow design standards for drainage facilities that reflect best available science and data, which indicate a need for more stringent requirements based on the impacts of storm events as they presently occur and are expected to occur in the future. 

ENV 12: During the development review process, limit pavement and other impervious surface that does not serve a necessary purpose in the development. 

ENV 13: Promote green infrastructure other than stormwater retention ponds as a means of managing stormwater. The larger and more complex a project, the more consideration should be given to treatment trains, wetlands bioretention, and other creative stormwater solutions. 

ENV 14: Design stormwater management facilities to provide additional benefits beyond stormwater treatment and retention, such as wetlands ecosystems, wildlife habitat and recreation. 

ENV 15: Encourage piped stormwater management over ditches when reasonable to reduce stormwater maintenance requirements for the City.

ENV 16: Identify locations where regional stormwater management facilities are necessary or beneficial and proactively construct those facilities in coordination with developers as feasible.

ENV 17: Plan for the following anticipated future sea level rise scenarios as recommended by the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission: 
  • 1.5 feet of SLR for near-term planning, occurring by 2050 
  • 3.0 feet of SLR for medium-term planning, represented by the timeframe 2050–2080 
  • 4.5 feet of SLR for long-term planning relevant to timeframes beyond year 2080 
ENV 18: Direct development towards higher ground to the greatest extent practicable while discouraging development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. No new critical infrastructure should be built where there is an anticipated sea level rise impact that would occur in the lifespan of the facility unless required by the nature of the infrastructure. 

ENV 19: Consider flood risk when reviewing new developments and work with developers to minimize risk.

ENV 20: Achieve Class 5 in the Community Rating System (CRS), particularly through preserving open space in the floodplain, preserving wetlands, maintaining drainage systems and completing mitigation activities for buildings within the floodplains

ENV 21: Work with communities anticipated to be affected by sea level rise to proactively adapt to future conditions through implementation of Resilient Area Plans. 

ENV 22: Develop a program to assist homeowners in flood-prone areas in making their homes more resilient to flooding. 

ENV 23: Utilize a variety of flooding adaptation strategies that are both structural and non-structural and meet the definition of “no adverse impacts”. 

ENV 24: Review and revise as necessary the Floodplain Management section of the City Code to appropriately mitigate flooding risk to citizens. 

ENV 25: Plan future landscaping and other vegetation to reflect anticipated future conditions, particularly in the Special Flood Hazard Area. 

ENV 26: New City facilities located outside of storm surge and flood zones should be considered and, if appropriate, designed to serve the community as emergency shelters. 

ENV 27: Protect new and existing public and private infrastructure and facilities from hazards by prioritizing site selection, followed by construction and other protective or mitigation techniques. 

ENV 28: Implement hazard awareness and risk reduction principles into the City’s daily activities and processes to promote life safety during hazardous events, and to enhance community-wide understanding and awareness of community hazards.

ENV 29: Maintain a disaster response and recovery plan that describes recovery efforts during, immediately following, and postevent.

ENV 30: Identify environmental justice populations that are underserved by tree canopy and prioritize them for future plantings. Encourage new developments and redevelopments in these areas to go above and beyond ordinance-required landscaping requirements. 

ENV 31: Identify areas experiencing the Urban Heat Island effect and develop strategies to mitigate impacts. 

ENV 32: Develop and adopt an Urban Forestry Plan that includes inventorying existing trees and sets guidance on enhancing and restoring urban forest quality through age and species diversification, among other tasks and policies. 

ENV 33: When verges are included in development, they should be of sufficient width for healthy tree planting and future tree growth. 

ENV 34: Proactively monitor and remove tree pests, particularly those that are likely to have wide-ranging impacts on the entire tree canopy.

ENV 35: Preserve and maintain existing healthy mature trees, while also supplementing with public and private reforestation efforts to promote a healthy and diverse tree canopy across the City.

ENV 36: Update the City’s landscaping and buffering ordinance to include additional invasive species on the “Undesirable Tree Species” list, and clarify the planting of which cannot contribute to required landscaping. 

ENV 37: Encourage opportunities for additional tree plantings in appropriate natural environments as part of the development review process. 

ENV 38: Adopt an ordinance establishing a tree canopy fund for the purposes of collecting fees from developers that cannot provide their canopy requirements on site and using them to plant trees elsewhere in the City. 

ENV 39: Educate residents and officials about the negative impacts of invasive species, and implement programs for their strategic, targeted removal. 

ENV 40: Connect residents and businesses to existing resources on tree care and maintenance, and work with neighborhood groups to support their local tree canopy goals.

ENV 41: Identify and highlight historic, champion, and significant trees within local communities to increase likelihood of protection and maintenance.

ENV 42: Work with developers to protect green space that could serve as habitat or part of a contiguous wildlife corridor during the development process, prioritizing this land to satisfy landscaping and tree canopy requirements. 

ENV 43: Partner with environmental organizations to fund water quality and aquatic habitat projects, particularly in conjunction with industrial users. 

ENV 44: Support the acquisition of properties that expand wildlife habitat and protect migration patterns.

ENV 45: Work with regional partners to ensure long-term solutions for safe, sustainable, efficient solid waste disposal. 

ENV 46: Continue to implement strategic solutions that allow for residents and businesses to continue recycling

ENV 47: Develop and implement a waste reduction strategy with education and pilot programs to help reduce waste going to the landfill.

ENV 48: Develop a City energy policy that includes renewable energy and energy efficiency goals and a mechanism for publicly reporting energy use. 

ENV 49: Encourage the use of solar panels on top of buildings and in other unused or underutilized spaces such as parking lots. 

ENV 50: Model renewable energy usage in the City by proactively installing renewable energy throughout public areas, such as solar panels in City parking lots. 

ENV 51: Support Electric Vehicle technology and review City codes and ordinances that may need to be amended to allow the implementation of EV infrastructure.

Growth Management and Rural Areas

GMRA 1: Prioritize the protection of agricultural and environmentally sensitive land by limiting development in those areas, and also encouraging development in more suitable areas to minimize suburban sprawl.

GMRA 2: Support and focus density in a few strategic areas of the City as indicated in Character Districts and Overlay Districts and prioritize infrastructure improvements needed to support that density.

GMRA 4: Evaluate the existing requirements for a Planned Unit Development in the Urban Overlay District to make creating such developments more feasible.

GMRA 5: Develop a Transfer of Development Rights program to ensure density occurs in the parts of the City where it is most appropriate, and rural landowners are compensated for preventing development of their land.

GMRA 6: Achieve a pattern of compatible land use and growth that is balanced between uses and follows a logical pattern without “leap frogging” to parts of the City unserved by appropriate utilities and infrastructure.

GMRA 8: Review the Zoning Ordinance and make necessary changes to implement the “Reinvest and Preserve” development strategy in which housing, commercial, and industrial land use densities are slightly increased to preserve open space, create pockets of density, and increase community desired outcomes such as walkability.

GMRA 15: Assess the Zoning Ordinance for any regulations that should be in place to protect agriculture, such as buffers from incompatible uses, as well as opportunities to find flexibility in standards for typical rural- and agriculture-related uses in the Rural Overlay, where conditions may necessitate different requirements.

GMRA 17: Give special consideration to the unique recreation needs of rural residents, and continue to plan for the equine community. 

GMRA 18: Support and expand tools such as the Open Space and Agriculture Preservation (OSAP) and the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) programs to protect agriculture, open spaces, and rural landscapes. 

GMRA 19: Develop an ordinance to allow for farming villages, a unique style of development that allow for residences while protecting large tracts of agricultural land.

GMRA 20: Preserve essential elements of rural character including distant views of the countryside, topography, natural drainage patterns, country roads, open space including agricultural fields and pastures, fences and hedgerows, barns and other farm buildings.

GMRA 22: Encourage developers to construct cluster subdivisions rather than piano key development, taking care to minimize visual impact and preserve natural features.

GMRA 24: When developing rural property for non-agricultural uses, to the greatest extent possible, preserve fences, hedgerows, tree lines, and natural vegetation to protect these landscape features during construction. Retain treed areas between roads and buildings and protect these areas during construction.

Housing

HOU 6: Encourage energy efficient building practices to assist with long-term affordability of housing.

HOU 7: Review the Zoning Ordinance for amendments that allow for smaller unit and lot size in appropriate zoning districts

HOU 8: Support the development of multifamily housing that includes five or more units.

HOU 10: Support the development of missing middle housing, and consider Zoning Ordinance amendments that are needed to allow for these housing types.

HOU 17: Encourage the adaptive reuse of existing non-residential buildings for residential use where appropriate.

HOU 22: Expand and promote the real estate tax abatement and grant programs to provide additional incentives for low-income homeowners to improve their homes, and encourage adaptive rehabilitation/reuse of historic structures.

HOU 23: Implement an energy efficiency improvement program for existing housing.

HOU 40: Provide and fund housing rehabilitation programs that assist senior homeowners to repair, modernize, and improve the energy efficiency of their homes, and remove barriers to aging in place.

Placemaking

DES 3: Preserve developments’ natural spaces for community use or conservation, whichever is appropriate.

DES 12: Support decreased lot sizes and flexibility of lot alignment when it will protect sensitive environmental features and not increase the overall density that would be allowed on the tract or be directly incompatible with surrounding uses.

DES 13: Emphasize connection to the public right-of-way in Urban and Suburban Overlays communities, with front entrances connected to pedestrian walkways and sidewalks.

DES 15: Encourage more walkable, mixed use, and higher intensity commercial development, particularly in areas of the City near existing or proposed Employment Centers in the Suburban and Urban Overlay Districts.

DES 17: Implement form-based code in areas of City where it is most impactful, particularly areas that should be walkable, mixed-use, and people-oriented.

DES 20: Promote interior sidewalk connections throughout commercial and mixed-use developments.

DES 21: Encourage developers to provide reciprocal access between commercial and mixed-use developments in order to enhance connectivity, prioritizing the consolidation of existing vehicle access points and limiting new vehicle access points.

DES 22: Aggregate required green or open space to make it more usable and increase environmental benefits.

DES 29: Review all development and City construction projects for impacts based on the Environmentally Sensitive Overlay and provide mitigation for those impacts or refrain from developing in those areas.

DES 30: Encourage developers to reduce light pollution by limiting the brightness of exterior fixtures and promoting full cut-off fixtures when practical. Where a development will occur in a highly natural area or where wildlife may be impacted, even greater consideration should be given to such practices. 

DES 31: Develop an ordinance directed towards reducing light pollution. 

DES 32: Ensure the City continues to manage detrimental impacts from noise.

DES 33: When a development would impact existing natural areas or known habitat, consideration should be given to whether or not wildlife-vehicle collisions will increase, and thus whether a dedicated wildlife crossing or other measure needs to be considered.

DES 34: Direct higher commercial and residential density around future or current areas served by public transit with the greatest focus around transit hubs or transfer stations.

DES 35: Review Zoning Districts to lower parking minimums where appropriate, and unless provided reasonable justification, require the use of structured parking in the Urban Mixed-Use Character Districts.

DES 36: Encourage high-quality streetscaping for parking areas and include continuous, visible, internal pedestrian walkways.

DES 37: Use parking lots as an opportunity to create treed and vegetated areas, capturing stormwater runoff and aggregating required landscaping into usable space where plants can thrive, as opposed to only building small parking islands.

DES 39: Encourage developers to include enhanced landscaping in their projects as a way to create unique places and a sense of community pride.

DES 40: Ensure the City sets the tone for landscaping by going above the minimum code-required efforts on City-owned property that residents and customers often frequent.

DES 41: Identify existing major roadways and medians for enhanced landscaping and streetscape treatment and require landscaping in strategic future roadway projects. 

DES 42: Encourage the use of native plantings and conservation landscaping in public and private projects.

DES 44: Establish and fund a citywide policy for the planting and maintenance of street trees. As a starting point, staff will refer to the Virginia Department of Transportation and City Landscape guidelines when designing street sections and the need for any planting of street trees.

DES 45: Include appropriate landscaping when roadway projects require the installation of public utilities or otherwise create the opportunity

DES 46: Review the street sections and related guidelines in the Public Facilities Manual for possible amendments that clarify the expectations for road design and accompanying facilities, such as sidewalks, underground utilities, and street trees.

DES 47: Promote the use of wayfinding and signage in key areas that reflect the unique character of each area. Invest in wayfinding that functions at both pedestrian and vehicular levels.

PLC 6: Inventory and evaluate vacant lots and large parking areas that can be used by neighborhoods for gathering and beautification, and work with residents to activate those spaces.

PLC 7: Extend the scope of traditional land banking activities to include the creation of public spaces that provide opportunities for residents to gather, particularly where such places are scarce.

PLC 26: Continue to support tourism marketing strategies that highlight Chesapeake’s historic resources, birds and wildlife, green space, and other attractive attributes.

Quality of Life

QOL 2: Design and landscape sustainable City facilities so they are a landmark of the community, are accessible for all, and provide community spaces as needed.

QOL 24: Build on Chesapeake’s existing natural amenities and recreational assets to provide a parks and recreation system that serves all of Chesapeake’s population with a variety of facilities and programs.

QOL 28: Determine where public access to the water is needed, and develop a plan to acquire it and provide amenities such as boat ramps and kayak and canoe launches.

QOL 31: Create multi-functional parks that store stormwater, reduce flooding, and improve water quality where appropriate.

See also the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Master Plan: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3460/PRT-Master-Plan





Earth Month Chesapeake 2026

 


Calendar of Events

  • Saturday, March 28 - Great American Cleanup
  • Saturday, April 4 - Flowers and Ferns Walk
  • Saturday, April 4 - Greenbrier Parkway Cleanup
  • Saturday, April 11 - Chesapeake Recycles Day 
    • Western Branch High School, 9 am to Noon
    • GFL, Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA), and Shred-It are partnering with us to collect a wide variety of items at each of our events. In general, accepted items will include electronics (e-waste), household hazardous waste, and sensitive documents.  Also collecting Child Safety Seats for re-use. 
    • https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/1089/Chesapeake-Recycles-Day
  • Saturday, April 11 - Indian River Park Second Saturday Hike
    • Indian River Park, 8:30 am to 10 am
    • Learn about the history of the park, the native trees and plants in this century old forest on the Indian River flood plain, and its value to maintaining the health of local butterfly, bird, and wildlife populations.
    • More Info: https://www.friendsofindianriver.org/p/calendar.html
  • Saturday, April 11th -  Sam's Circle and Sentinel Drive Clean Up   
  • Friday, April 13 – Thursday, April 19 - Chesapeake C.A.R.E.S. Cleanup  Challenge
    • City Departments Cleanup Challenge (City Departments Only)
  • Saturday,  April 18 - Friends of Indian River Adopt-a-Park
  • Saturday, April 18 - Spring Migration Bird Walk
    • Cancelled
  • Saturday, April 18 - Earth Day Festival
  • Sunday, April 19 - The Lorax Movie  -“Speak for the Trees” 
  • Tuesday, April 21 - Earth Day Proclamation at City Council
    • City Council Chambers, Chesapeake City Hall, 306 Cedar Rd, 6:30 pm
    • We would love to see the City Council Chamber filled with people who care for the environment.  Wear your favorite environmental t-shirt, or something green or blue, and join us to stand up for a Greener Chesapeake!
    • This will be at the start of the agenda and should be complete by 7 pm.  
    • Location: City Hall, 306 Cedar Road, Chesapeake, VA 23322
    • Let us know you are coming by signing up at  https://forms.gle/7KxNbi7W1eiho75s6
  • Wednesday, April 22 - The BIG Tree Tour
  • Wednesday, April 22 - CEIC Earth Day Open House
  • Wednesday, April 22 - Green Drinks Chesapeake
    • Chesapeake Arboretum, 6 pm - 8 pm
    • Our next Green Drinks falls on Earth Day and we're doing something different. We will gather at the Chesapeake Arboretum. Bring a camp chair and your favorite NON-alcoholic beverage (this is a City park), and enjoy the evening with folks who care about the Earth and a greener Chesapeake. 
    • Location: 624 Oak Grove Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320. 
    • We're going to order pizza, so to know how much to order, please RSVP at https://forms.gle/pa6NKcV1S8jJWLRb6
    • More Info: https://www.greeningchesapeake.com/p/green-drinks-chesapeake.html
  • Friday, April 24-Saturday,  April 25 - Master Gardener Plant Sale
  • Saturday, April 25 - Fix-It-Fair
    • Western Branch Community Center, 10 am to 2 pm
    • Repair, Reuse, Recycle! Bring your textiles, jewelry, small appliances or furniture, and bicycles to be fixed for free, and save it from the landfill! We can’t guarantee it will be fixed, but we will try!
    • More Info: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3750/Earth-Month
  • Saturday, April 25 - Trash Can Painting Contest
    • Western Branch Park - Basketball Courts, Noon to 3 pm
    • Come help beautify our parks with a fun trash can painting contest! After the event, photos of the trash can designs will be posted to the Chesapeake Parks, Recreation and Tourism Facebook page where you can vote by “reacting” to your favorites. Winning entries will receive a prize pack!
    • More Info: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3750/Earth-Month
  • Sunday, April 26 - Waterway Market at Great Bridge Village 
  • Monday, April 27 - Environmental Wins Town Hall
    • Join Virginia LCV, Climate Action Virginia, local General Assembly Delegates, and partners as we hold a town hall in celebration of environmental wins this General Assembly and Earth Day.
    • 6 pm to 7:30 pm, more info at https://www.mobilize.us/lcvva/event/934570/
  • Saturday, May 2 - Clean the Bay Day ** New Date **
  • All Month - Throwing Shade - Native Tree and Shrub Discount  
  • All Month - Lights Out Hampton Roads
    • As part of this voluntary program, the Cape Henry Audubon Soceity and its partners urge property managers, businesses, tenants, government agencies, and residents help to prevent night-time bird collisions with building by turning off and/or blocking as many external and internal building lights at workplaces as possible at night during the spring migration to help prevent injury and death of migrating birds, especially from 11 pm to sunrise.   Learn how you can help at https://www.birdsafehr.org/
  • Every Friday - Friday Farmers Market


General Assembly 2026

 

This is a roundup of some of the Environmental Bills at General Assembly that we're tracking.  Overall, the Virginia League of Conservation Voters is tracking 136 Bills at https://valcv.org/2026-bill-tracking/

Key budget items related to environmental issues highlighted by the Virginia Conservation Network related to VCAP Funding, RGGI, Data Centers, PFAS, and State Park : https://app.glueup.com/view-in-browser/6269:469712:82e083d8-b1b9-487a-8db0-a60c3947b046

Links below go to the https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-search

RGGI: HB397 Direct DEQ to establish auction program (rejoining RGGI) - Passed House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 920 (effective 7/1/2026).

Trees: HB549 strengthen canopy requirements, amended to be less stringent - passed House (64‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (24‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 626 (effective 7/1/2026).

Invasive Species: HB88 – not plant and remove along highways; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 63 (effective 7/1/2026). HB109 close commercial viability loophole; adds phase out period for any such plant commercially propagated in Virginia; passed House (96‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 66 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB89 permit local service district to control invasive species - Passed Senate  (38‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House (92‑Y 6‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 130 (effective 7/1/2026).

Data Centers: HB155 SCC would have to permit facilities > 25 MW; Left in Labor and Commerce HB507 limit CO2 emissions from backup generators; set emission limits for generators; passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (25‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 397 (effective 7/1/2026). HB897 - require renewable energy to get tax credits; passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed by indefinitely in S-Finance and Appropriations committee (15‑Y 0‑N).  SB465 - require renewable energy to get tax credits; Left in Finance and Appropriations; SB339 allocate cost of transmission infrastructure; Directs the State Corporation Commission to conduct proceedings to review cost allocation among different customer classifications for certain electric utilities; passed Senate (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate LC Subcommittee #3 recommends continuing to 2027 (Voice Vote); HB496 disclose water usage; passed House (74‑Y 23‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate with substitute (25‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (78‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 623 (effective 7/1/2026). HB589 water usage; Left in Committee Agriculture Chesapeake and Natural Resources HB153 noise assessment - passed House (90‑Y 7‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (26‑Y 14‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (93‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 567 (effective 7/1/2026). SB94 restrict data centers to Industrial Zoning; subsitute now requires noise assessment as in HB153; passed Senate (21‑Y 18‑N 1‑A); Passed House with substitute (80‑Y 14‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (91‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 568 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB130 noise assessment; merged into SB94. HB641 Continued to 2027 in H-Finance committee;/SB393 $3/sq. ft. tax to fund Great Outdoors Act; Continued to 2027 in S-Finance and Appropriations;

Renewable Energy: HB628 ammended bill passed House  (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (22‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (97‑Y 1‑N 0‑A); SB175 strengthen standards for more small-scale solar; passed Senate (23‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendment (93‑Y 5‑N 0‑A); House amendment agreed to by Senate (23‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 645 (effective 7/1/2026); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 646 (effective 7/1/2026).  HB895 ammended bill  passed House (65‑Y 32‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (68‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 694 (effective 7/1/2026). /SB448 Energy Storage requirements; ammended bill  passed Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A);Passed House with substitute (66‑Y 33‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 695 (effective 7/1/2026). HB590  passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate with substitute (23‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (64‑Y 33‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 633 (effective 7/1/2026). /SB382  streamline rooftop solar permitting; passed Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Passed House with substitute (73‑Y 26‑N 0‑A);Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (64‑Y 32‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 634 (effective 7/1/2026). HB395   ammended bill passed House (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (30‑Y 8‑N 1‑A)Senate substitute agreed to by House (93‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted /SB250 permit small solar < 1200 W; passed Senate (30‑Y 7‑N 1‑A); Passed House with substitute (96‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 11‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted. SB26 passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendments (75‑Y 21‑N 0‑A); House amendments agreed to by Senate (20‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 758 (effective 7/1/2026). /HB1234 allow localities to require solar over parking;  passed House (76‑Y 22‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (67‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 757 (effective 7/1/2026).

Climate Change: HB1356 adjust precipitation design standards;Continued to 2027 in H-Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources; HB1092 protection of employees from heat illness; passed House (62‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (21‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (61‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 731 (effective 7/1/2026).

Land Conservation: SB519 assess how to conserve 20% of land in Virginia; passed Senate (39‑Y 1‑N 0‑A); H-RUL Studies Subcommittee recommends continuing to 2027 (Voice Vote);  HB237 include floodplains in conservation mapping; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with amendment Block Vote; Senate amendment agreed to by House (99‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 915 (effective 7/1/2026). HB390 establish Habitat Policy Oversight Committee; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 131 (effective 7/1/2026).  HB521 – ensure no net loss of wetlands while permitting;  passed House (74‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (70‑Y 25‑N 0‑A);Approved by Governor‑Chapter 161 (effective 7/1/2026). HB889 transmission line construction to use existing ROW first;  passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 28 (effective 7/1/2026).

Housing energy efficiency HB2 passed House (65‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (24‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted. HB3 passed House (78‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (38‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 540 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB5 passed Senate Block Vote (39‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendment (72‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); House amendment agreed to by Senate (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A);Approved by Governor‑Chapter 541 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB72 passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Passed House (64‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted.

Conservation Funding: HB70 Resilient Virginia Revolving Fund; passed House (82‑Y 16‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate (36‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 57 (effective 7/1/2026) HB386 Chesapeake Bay Pay for Outcomes Fund; Left in Committee Appropriations HB1038 - Virginia Student Environmental Literacy Plan Grant Fund; Left in Committee Appropriations SB420 Extreme Weather Taxpayer Protection Fund - (defeated) in committee (6‑Y 8‑N);

Fisheries: HB389 Climate adaption plan - Continued to next session; HB1048 Menhaden fishery pause; Left in Committee Agriculture Chesapeake and Natural Resources HB1049 Menhaden quotas; Left in Committee Appropriations

PFAS:  HB938 passed House (88‑Y 7‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 709 (effective 7/1/2026) HB1443 passed House  (67‑Y 29‑N 0‑A); assed Senate with substitute Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (74‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 853 (effective 7/1/2026)SB138 passed Senate Block Vote (39‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House Block Vote (95‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 710 (effective 7/1/2026). HB880 incorporated into HB 1443; HB1072  passed House (62‑Y 34‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate (23‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 933 (effective 7/1/2026) HB348  Left in Committee Appropriations

Environmental Justice: HB256 include in Comp Plans - passed House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A);Senate substitute agreed to by House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 581 (effective 7/1/2026). HB1266 public hearing notice - passed House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate with substitute (22‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (65‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 461 (effective 7/1/2026).

Bicycles: HB661 “Idaho Stop” bikes yield at stop signs; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Reported from S-Transportation committee and rereferred to Finance and Appropriations (13‑Y 1‑N); Continued to 2027 in S-Finance and Appropriations committee (14‑Y 0‑N).  SB84 - Traffic Camera - funds to be used for projects, or programs that improve traffic safety, speed management, bicycle and pedestrian safety, public transit, and local systemic safety initiatives - passed Senate (27‑Y 11‑N 0‑A); Passed House with substitute (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 967 (effective 7/1/2026).

Affordable Housing: HB594 - Allows a locality to authorize a zoning administrator to use an administrative process to approve rezoning applications for affordable housing developments. - passed House (89‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (28‑Y 12‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (81‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 406 (effective 7/1/2026).

Oppose

Rollback renewable energy standards: HB615 Left in Labor and Commerce, HB1031 Left in Labor and Commerce, SB40 - Passed by indefinitely in S-Commerce and Labor committee (9‑Y 6‑N)

----------------------------------

See also the Chesapeake Sustainability Network's Legislative Priorities

Legislative Priorities 2026

  Legislative Priorities


Every year, the City prepares a set of Legislative Priorities, its official wishlist for next year's General Assembly in Richmond.  You can see the City's draft Legislative Priorities here.

We are asking for a short list of items to be added to the priorities for 2026.  These include requests to support:
  • Legislation to give localities the option to set stronger standards to preserve and expand tree canopy
  • Staffing for the Virginia Department of Forestry's Urban and Community Forestry program, threatened by federal funding cuts  
  • Increased funding for the Virginia Conservation Assistance Program (VCAP), Virginia Agricultural Cost-Share (VACS), as well as sufficient staffing in Soil and Water Conservation Districts to implement these programs.
  • Legislative initiatives that protect non-data center customers from rising electricity costs caused by the need to expand electricity infrastructure to support large data centers
  • Legislation to have the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) establish regulations on PFAS and PFOA "Forever Chemicals,” to protect residents from water and soil pollution
  • Legislation to enable localities to prohibit hunting from state waters adjacent to any subdivisions of a city that are so heavily populated as to make such hunting dangerous to the residents
The draft document is being presented to the City Council at their Work Session on Tuesday, Oct 28.   There is an opportunity for Citizen Comments on Non-Agenda items later that evening at their Council's regular meeting starting at 6:30 pm.  See the meeting agenda at https://chesapeake.granicus.com/DocumentViewer.php?file=chesapeake_f24dd328fe7f013b978571bffdc7204b.pdf&view=1

Chesapeake Comp Plan Comments

January 2026 Update

The City Council approved the new, revised Chesapeake 2045 Comprehensive Plan for the City on January 20.   Overall,  the document presented a strong vision for creating a high-quality future for the City that is proactive about developing necessary infrastructure, protects green and open space, works to connect people, and respects the unique character of different parts of the City.   It is worth noting the diligent work of the planning staff in developing a plan that covers so many critical areas.  

At the City Council meeting, we rasied concerns that the City did not give itself enough time to consider inputs to the final draft last year.  The final draft document was out for review for two months, but staff only gave itself 4 or 5 work days to incorporate any feedback before going to the Planning Commssion.  As outlined below, several of our comments were not acted upon.   When the City Council was voting on the Plan, Council Member did make a statement that the City should do more about conservation landscaping and environmental education; these were two key policy recommendations we had been making.  Although again, that was past the point when any edits were made.  



November Update

Several of the issues we raised in our letter (see below) were addressed in the draft presented on October 8th, including policy modification to


  • [edit] "Connect residents and businesses to existing resources on tree care and maintenance ..."
  • [new] "Encourage the use of native plantings and conservation landscaping in public and private projects."
  • [new] "Coordinate with utility providers to plan for future utility corridor and infrastructure expansions"
  • [edit] "Use parking lots as an opportunity to create treed and vegetated areas, capturing stormwater runoff and aggregating required landscaping into usable space where plants can thrive, as opposed to only building small parking islands
  • [edit] "Develop a City energy policy that includes renewable energy and energy efficiency goals and a mechanism for publicly reporting energy use.
  • [edit] state that for Conservation Districts, "Only limited passive and nature-based recreation and access is appropriate on these sites."

However, several important recommendations were not addressed.  A key area is educating and connecting residents, businesses, and institutions with conservation landscaping practices such as the use of native plants, creating pollinator gardens, rain gardens, and reducing erosion.  Many local organizations are working on this today, and we need continued support from the City.  


Other recommendations that were missed in the draft were


  • Connecting farmers with cost-share programs to implement best practices that improve the City's environment and help farmers preserve their land.   
  • The wording related to the City modeling renewable energy through rooftop solar
  • The value, including to taxpayers, of reducing residential yard waste going to the landfill
  • Encouraging community solar
  • Evaluating the impact of sea level rise on the Northwest River Water Treatment Plant, a risk identified by the Department of Homeland Security, to protect our water supply.


Some uncompleted policies from the 2035 Comp Plan that we should carry forward are to


  • "Educate residents and officials about the importance of protecting wetlands and riparian areas"
  • "Identifying city-owned land that can be set aside for tree preservation." 
  • "Encourage the establishment of farmers’ markets and community gardens


We raised these issues at the Planning Commission, and there was a good discussion among the commissioners. We were called up to answer follow-up questions.  Commissioners asked the Planning Department if additional changes could be made to the document between now and the final City Council approval and got an affirmative response.  Ultimately, they recommended approval of the draft as is.  Since then, the Planning Department has said they were not intending to make any more changes.

The next step is a presentation by the Planning Department to the City Council at a Work Session to be scheduled, likely in December.  Between now and then, we have an opportunity to reach out to City Council members to ask for their support on the above issues.  


September Comments Letter

The DRAFT Chesapeake Comprehensive Plan is now published and in a 60 day public comment period thru  September 26. See the draft document and learn more at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3275/Comprehensive-Plan-Update 


The Planning Department released the October 1st draft of the Comp Plan which will go to the Planning Commission on October 8th.  


Key Policy Recommendations in this letter that were not addressed in the October 1st draft are highlighted in   YELLOW

These comments were submitted to Planning Department on September 25, 2025

Editorial corrections are underlined.

To: Planning Department

Re: Environment and Sustainability Comments on Draft Comprehensive Plan

On behalf of the multiple undersigned organizations and individuals coordinating through the Chesapeake Sustainability Network, please accept the attached comments on the July Draft of the Chesapeake Comprehensive Plan.

Executive Summary 

The Comprehensive Plan lays out a roadmap for the City for the next twenty years.  We applaud the draft for providing a strong vision for creating a high-quality future for the City that is proactive about developing necessary infrastructure, protects green and open space, works to connect people, and respects the unique character of different parts of the City.   The policies presented adopt the principles of Smart Growth, and focus on moving people on Complete Streets that provide safe access to all, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users. The document includes good policies related to the environment, resilience, and supporting rural areas.   

 

There are several key areas in which we would like to see improvements. 

 

Healthy Landscapes


While the document goes into detail on policies related to Wetlands and Riparian Buffers, Tree Canopy, and Green Infrastructure, it often treats nature as something to be found in "Environmentally Sensitive" areas of the City and wildlife as something only found in "natural areas" like the Great Dismal Swamp.   The reality is that nature and wildlife co-exist with people throughout the City in every Character District.   In every part of the City, people will encounter birds and bees, butterflies and dragonflies.  Birds, squirrels, turtles, raccoons, and a whole variety of creatures loved and sometimes underappreciated live in our backyards and front yards, our trees, shrubs, and hedges, our parks, and our stream buffers.  Doug Tallamy's book "Bringing Nature Home" highlights the critical importance of implementing conservation landscaping across all our urban and suburban areas.  Conservation landscaping practices also reduce stormwater runoff. The Chesapeake Environmental Improvement Council, the Virginia Dare Soil and Water Conservation District, Elizabeth River Project, Chesapeake Master Gardeners, AskHRGreen, Virginia Native Plant Society, Butterfly Society, Friends of Indian River, Cape Henry Audubon Society, and other local and regional groups all work to promote and encourage these practices  They are also supported by the American Planning Association, the American Society of Landscape Architects and other national organizations. These practices also support a variety of local businesses including native plant-focused nurseries, landscapers certified in conservation landscaping practices, and shoreline restoration contractors.

The document needs to incorporate policies that connect residents, businesses, farmers, institutions, and officials with resources to implement these conservation landscaping practices.  Likewise, municipal landscaping activities should adopt these conservation best practices.

The 2035 Comp Plan included a policy to identify areas of city owned land that can be set aside for tree preservation; this is an ongoing need and this policy should be carried forward into the new Comp Plan.  The policy to adopt a tree canopy fund should ensure that any tree plantings using this fund are located as closely as feasible to where the original development project is situated, as per state code.

Composting should be encouraged to reduce the amount of yard waste that needs to be collected by the City.

As in the 2035 Comp Plan, we need to continue to encourage the establishment of farmers’ markets and community gardens to provide healthy, local food for the community and support the local farming economy.  

Energy Infrastructure

 

The draft Plan looks at Water and Sewer, Roads and Rail, and even Broadband/Fiber Optics.  It touches on Renewable Energy.  But it does not address the impact of energy transmission infrastructure.  Chesapeake has seen significant expansion of energy infrastructure in recent years, including solar farms, gas pipelines (e.g. the Southside Connector, Virginia Reliability Project, Chesapeake Compressor Station), and electric transmission lines (e.g. the connection from Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Project to Fentress Substation).  This expansion of infrastructure is expected to continue to support electrification of vehicle charging and home heating, construction of data centers, Virginia Commerce Park, etc.  As shown with Southside Connector and other projects, this can result in significant disruptions and concerns for local communities about pollution and environmental justice.  The City should plan ahead to minimize these impacts.

 

There is a need for a policy to have the City to proactively plan for expansion of energy infrastructure including new electricity transmission lines, solar and wind generation, battery storage, and gas pipelines to minimize disruption to existing communities and environmentally sensitive areas. 

 

Green Infrastructure

 

The draft Plan explains the requirements to use best management practices to both manage the quantity of stormwater runoff and reduce pollution and sediment carried in the runoff into our rivers and bays. It discusses the benefits of Green Infrastructure to address increasing rainfall and flooding using nature-based solutions like rain gardens, bioswales, permeable pavements, trees and landscaping, and rainwater harvesting systems.  But then it hedges on the concern that Green Infrastructure may be more expensive to maintain and ultimately includes a policy to "Encourage piped stormwater management when reasonable to reduce stormwater maintenance requirements for the City."   

 

While purely Green Infrastructure may not be the right fit for every situation, as per state regulations, the City must always incorporate best management practices to meet pollution control requirements and solutions should be evaluated on lifecycle cost and co-benefits, not just direct maintenance costs, before "encouraging" the use of grey infrastructure.


Northwest River Water Treatment Plant and Sea Level Rise

The document directly addresses Sea Level Rise (SLR) and adopts the HRPDC recommendations to plan for 1.5-feet of SLR by 2050,  • 3.0-feet of SLR for 2050–2080, and 4.5-feet of SLR  beyond the year 2080.  One key risk identified by the Department of Homeland Security is to the Northwest River Water Treatment Plant.  This water treatment plant provides the City with up to 10 million gallons of clean water daily.  However, sea level rise threatens to make the Northwest River more salty as tidal waters push further inland.  

 

Include a policy to evaluate the impact of sea level rise on the Northwest River Water Treatment Plan.

Energy Efficiency and Solar

The plan calls for the City to model renewable energy usage.  But it should also model energy efficiency.  The City should also encourage residential solar, shared solar and community-scale solar.



Detailed Recommendations

 

Below are detailed comments on the whole plan. It is divided into three parts: Key Policy Recommendations, Other Suggested Edits and Corrections, and Positive Content in Draft. Suggested edits are in red.

- Key Policy Recommendations 
- Other Suggested Edits and Corrections
- Positive Content in Draft


Key Policy Recommendations

Healthy Landscapes

While the document goes into detail on policies related to Wetlands and Riparian Buffers, Tree Canopy, and Green Infrastructure, it often treats nature as something to be found in "Environmentally Sensitive" areas of the City and wildlife as something only found in "natural areas" like the Great Dismal Swamp.   The reality is that nature and wildlife co-exist with people throughout the City.  The Chesapeake Environmental Improvement Council, the Virginia Dare Soil and Water Conservation District, Elizabeth River Project, Chesapeake Master Gardeners, AskHRGreen, Virginia Native Plant Society, Butterfly Society, Friends of Indian River, Cape Henry Audubon Society, and other local and regional groups all work to promote and encourage these practices  They are also supported by the American Planning Association, the American Society of Landscape Architects and other national organizations. These practices also support a variety of local business including native plant-focused nurseries, landscapers certified in conservation landscaping practices, shoreline restoration contractors.   We recommend the following changes:

pp. 145-149 Environment and Resilience – Tree Canopy

Modify section title to “Tree Canopy and Conservation Landscaping”.  Alternatively, these could go into the following sections which could be renamed “Conservation Landscaping and Wildlife”

Add Text to define Conservation Landscaping, which involves gardening and landscape design that supports creating a healthy and sustainable environment.  It involves using native plants, reducing stormwater runoff and erosion, protecting shorelines and wetlands, minimizing the use of chemicals, and creating habitats that support wildlife such as birds, butterflies, bees, turtles, and other wildlife.   There is a preference to using plant species native to the coastal Virginia region as they best support insect populations that are the foundation of the natural food web.  Native plants are critical to sustaining biodiversity.  Native plants also provide a unique sense of place since they reflect the original landscape of the region. These practices are encouraged across all character districts in the City, including private residential and commercial properties, municipal and public spaces, employment centers, etc.

ADD Policy:  Connect residents, businesses, and institutions with resources to implement best practices such as conservation landscaping, rain gardens, permeable pavement, living shorelines and rain water harvesting. Inclusion of non-invasive native species for landscaping is preferred. [ source: SWCD  https://vaswcd.org/vcap/ ]  

ADD Policy: Educate residents and officials about importance of protecting wetlands and riparian areas for providing flood protection, water quality improvement, and ecosystem enhancement. [source - 2035 Comp Plan https://resources.cityofchesapeake.net/comp-plan-2035/#page=67 ]

Additional references: https://www.planning.org/blog/9258895/planning-with-nature-at-the-center/  , https://www.planning.org/pas/quicknotes/96/climate-resilient-pollinator-gardens/ , https://www.asla.org/sustainablelandscapes/Vid_Wildlife.html , https://www.asla.org/benefitsofplants.aspx

The Tree policies should be directed not just at residential homeowners, but all residents, businesses, and institutions such as churches, schools, and hospitals. 

EDIT Policy under TREES:  ENV 40: Connect homeowners residents, businesses, and institutions to existing resources on tree care and maintenance, and work with neighborhood groups to support their local tree canopy goals.

In 2025, the Commonwealth passed legislation allowing localities to adopt an ordinance establishing a tree canopy fund.  Section F of the same Ordinance states that “Any such tree canopy bank shall be within the locality and located as closely as feasible to where the development project is situated.”  Locating any tree planting as close as possible to the affected development is important to make sure the trees provide benefits to the users and residents of the development and the surrounding community.

EDIT Policy under TREES:  ENV 38: Adopt an ordinance establishing a tree canopy fund for the purposes of collecting fees from developers that cannot provide their canopy requirements on site and using them to plant trees elsewhere in the City  located as closely as feasible to where the development project is situated.  [.  Source – Virginia State Code https://lis.blob.core.windows.net/files/1074280.PDF , section F.]

Carry over policy to identify areas of city owned land that can be set aside for tree preservation from the current 2035 Comprehensive Plan.

Add Policy under TREES:  Identify areas of city owned land that can be set aside for tree preservation.[source - Comp Plan 2035 https://resources.cityofchesapeake.net/comp-plan-2035/#page=78 , PRT Master Plan briefing https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/DocumentCenter/View/24939/City-Council-Presentation-- page 8 ]

p. 149 Wildlife

- the draft states that “most residents do not regularly interact with the animals that roam Chesapeake’s natural areas”.  This takes a very narrow view of wildlife.  Section should recognize that wildlife includes all kinds of birds, butterflies, bees, squirrels, box turtles, and all varieties of small creatures that are found in our backyards, commercial and municipal landscaping, parks, and even street trees.  Wording should reflect that Many residents routinely interact with wildlife through gardening, backyard bird feeders, beekeeping, and bird watching.  Fishing is another very popular activity that brings residents in contact with wildlife.  Residents also sometimes have negative interactions resulting in human-wildlife conflicts, usually when wildlife are attracted to human dwellings or trash.  Conservation Landscaping practices play a critical role in supporting wildlife biodiversity in Chesapeake.

Reducing yard waste ending up in landfills is another critical process for our waste management efforts.  SPSA reports that about 20% of solid waste collected in the region is yard waste. [https://www.hrpdcva.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4297/Regional-Solid-Waste-Management-Plan-for-Southeastern-Virginia-PDF?bidId=]  The City needs to send thousands of truck trips every year to collect yard waste, especially in the autumn, to collect bags of leaves.  A significant fraction of this yard waste could be composted by residents and businesses on-site.  Yard waste collected could also be composted at scale and reused.  The City should adopt a policy to identify and encourage such strategies.

p. 151 Environment and Resilience – Solid Waste and Recycling

ADD Policy under SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING:   Identify strategies for encouraging composting by residents and reducing amount of yard waste that needs to be collected by City. [source – Public Works https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/1079/Tips-for-a-Clean-Chesapeake ]

Conservation practices are also encouraged for the agricultural sector.  Runoff from farmland is one of the largest sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution for both the Chesapeake Bay and the Southern Watersheds.  TMDL Action Plans are in effect to reduce these pollutants, and the Virginia Dare Soil and Water Conservation District has cost-share programs to support farmers installing best management practices to address the issue.  Implementing these programs improves water quality, including in the Northwest River, which supplies much of the City with water.  The practices reduce soil erosion and also provide important wildlife habitat. Chesapeake can support these efforts, particularly through the Chesapeake Extension Office.

ADD Policy under Growth Management and Rural Areas RURAL CHARACTER:  Connect farmers with cost-share programs to implement best practices such as erosion control, streamside buffers, cover crops, preserving wetlands, and nutrient management.   [source: https://www.dcr.virginia.gov/soil-and-water/document/cs-flier.pdf ]

On p. 209, the draft plan has a graphic showing the difference between Traditional Development and Cluster Development.  Cluster subdivisions are discussed in relation to the Rural Character in GMRA21 on p. 171. But cluster development can be effective in other character districts to preserve natural spaces for community use.  Cluster development can also help preserve space for connections to adjacent communities and facilities.  A classic problem today is where all the interior perimeter of a school faces private property with no connection to the subdivision street network, turning what could be a hundred-yard walk for students into a several mile drive. Perhaps state …

p. 203 Placemaking and Design – Community Design

EDIT Policy under Placemaking and Design COMMUNITY DESIGN: DES 3: Developments should encourage cluster development to preserve natural spaces for community use or conservation, whichever is appropriate, and support connections between communities.

The City can also support conservation landscaping on municipal properties and roadways, when practical.  It should also continue to adopt conservation mowing practices on municipal and public lands where there is not a direct interface with the people.  The City has this policy in the current 2035 Comprehensive Plan.  Continuing this policy can reduce mowing costs for the City, reduce runoff and flooding, and create wildlife habitat.  In the Solar Energy Policy, the City identified and adopted conservation mowing guidelines that should be extended to all conservation mowing areas.

pp. 213-214 Placemaking and Design – Landscaping

ADD Policy - Landscaping on municipal properties and roadways should incorporate conservation landscaping practices, such as the use of native plants, when practical. [https://www.plantvirginianatives.org/plant-southeast-virginia-natives].

ADD Policy - Adopt conservation mowing practices that reduce/minimize mowing of public lands, including expressway cloverleaves, school property, and park perimeters. [source Comp Plan 2035 -  https://resources.cityofchesapeake.net/comp-plan-2035/#page=83 , VDOT https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/about/programs/pollinator/ ]

ADD Text - Where appropriate, establish no mow areas that of a variety of native groundcovers, including warm season grasses, wildflowers, and native plants that benefit birds, bees, pollinators and other insects.   [source - https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/DocumentCenter/View/3291/City-of-Chesapeake-Solar-Energy-Policy-PDF?bidId= ]

Carry forward the policy from the 2035 Comprehensive Plan to encourage farmers’ markets and community gardens.  Most residents of the City still do not have close access to such sources of healthy, local food.  This is particularly difficult to residents who do not have ready access to personal automobiles, who often also live in food deserts.

p. 234 Quality of Life – Healthy Communities

ADD Policy: Encourage the establishment of farmers’ markets and community gardens to provide healthy, local food for the community and support local farming economy. [source - Comp Plan 2035 https://resources.cityofchesapeake.net/comp-plan-2035/#page=59 ]

 

Energy Infrastructure

The draft Plan looks at Water and Sewer, Roads and Rail, and even Broadband/Fiber Optics.  It touches on Renewable Energy.  But it does not address the impact of energy transmission infrastructure.  Chesapeake has seen significant expansion of energy infrastructure in recent years, including solar farms, gas pipelines (e.g. the Southside Connector, Virginia Reliability Project, Chesapeake Compressor Station), electric transmission lines (e.g. the connection from Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Project to Fentress Substation).  This expansion of infrastructure is expected to continue to support electrification of vehicle charging and home heating, construction of data centers, Virginia Commerce Park, etc.  As shown with Southside Connector and other projects, this can result in significant disruptions and concerns for local communities about pollution and environmental justice.  The City should plan ahead to minimize these impacts and incorporate the following:

p. 104 - Connectivity and Infrastructure – Utility Planning

ADD Policy: Proactively plan for expansion of energy infrastructure including new electricity transmission lines, solar and wind generation, battery storage, and gas pipelines to minimize disruption to existing communities and environmentally sensitive areas. 

 

Green Infrastructure

The draft Plan explains the requirements to use best management practices to both manage the quantity of stormwater runoff and reduce pollution and sediment carried in the runoff into our rivers and bays. It discusses the benefits of Green Infrastructure to address increasing rainfall and flooding using nature-based solutions like rain gardens, bioswales, permeable pavements, trees and landscaping, and rainwater harvesting systems.  But then it hedges on the concern that Green Infrastructure may be more expensive to maintain and ultimately includes a policy to "Encourage piped [grey infrastructure] stormwater management when reasonable to reduce stormwater maintenance requirements for the City."  While purely Green Infrastructure may not be the right fit for every situation, as per state regulations, the City must always incorporate best management practices to meet pollution control requirements and solutions should be evaluated on lifecycle cost and co-benefits, not just direct maintenance costs, before "encouraging" the use of grey infrastructure.   We recommend the alternative wording:

pp. 135-138 Environment and Resilience – Stormwater Management and Green Infrastructure

Edit Policy: ENV 15: Encourage Consider piped stormwater management when reasonable to reduce stormwater maintenance requirements for the City while complying with best management practice requirements for pollution and sediment control. [Source: https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/overcoming-barriers-green-infrastructure  added references: https://www.deq.virginia.gov/water/stormwater , https://www.deq.virginia.gov/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/bmp-clearinghouse]

p. 213 - Placemaking and Design   Parking Lots

Edit Policy DES 37 Use parking lots as an opportunity to create treed and vegetated areas, providing stormwater capture and aggregating required landscaping into usable space where plants can thrive, as opposed to only building small parking islands.

 

Northwest River Water Treatment Plant

The document directly addresses Sea Level Rise (SLR) and adopts the HRPDC recommendations to plan for 1.5-feet of SLR by 2050,  3.0-feet of SLR for 2050–2080, and 4.5-feet of SLR  beyond the year 2080.  One key risk identified by the Department of Homeland Security is to the Northwest River Water Treatment Plant.  This water treatment plant provides the City with up to 10 million gallons of clean water daily.  However, sea level rise threatens to make the Northwest River more salty as tidal waters push further inland.  Please consider:

pp. 139-142 Environment and Resilience –Sea Level Rise and Flooding

ADD Policy under SEA LEVEL RISE AND FLOODING: Evaluate impact of sea level rise on Northwest River Water Treatment Plan [source – Dept. Homeland Security https://www.amwa.net/assets/DHS_OCIA_Norfolk_Virginia_SLR.pdf , HRPDC https://www.hrtpo.org/DocumentCenter/View/6737/Section-6---Statement-of-Need-PDF  ]


Energy Efficiency and Solar

The draft plan includes some strong Renewable Energy policies.  Energy efficiency for city facilities should also be addressed, as it was in the 2035 Comp Plan.  The City should also model rooftop solar energy; construction of rooftop solar is less expensive than parking lot solar and generally has less of an issue of being shaded by tree canopy in and around parking lots.  The City should also encourage residential solar, shared solar, and community solar programs:

Pp 152-153 Environment and Resilience – Renewable Energy

EDIT Policy: ENV 48: Develop a City energy policy that includes energy efficiency and renewable energy goals and a mechanism for publicly reporting energy use. [source Comp Plan 2035 -  https://resources.cityofchesapeake.net/comp-plan-2035/#page=77 ]

EDIT Policy: ENV 50: Model renewable energy usage in the City by proactively installing renewable energy on rooftops and throughout public areas, such as solar panels in City parking lots.

ADD  Policy: Encourage residential solar, shared solar  and community-scale solar [source - https://energy.virginia.gov/renewable-energy/SS_CS.shtml]



Other Suggested Edits and Corrections

The following changes would make the document more accurate and well-rounded, but are not changes to proposed Policies.

p. 56 Environmentally Sensitive Overlay Map
-
add Indian River Park as Environmentally Sensitive area.  All of this park is within the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area.
-
add Oak Grove Lake Park as Environmentally Sensitive area as it includes forested wetlands

p. 58 Character District Map
– the shade of green between Rural and Conservation districts cannot be distinguished. 
Change the shade of green for one of these Character Districts.
-
add Dismal Swamp Canal Trail, Great Bridge Battlefield and Waterways Park, and Great Bridge Locks Park as Regional Parks.  All three draw visitors from around the region to use its superb bike path, kayak launches, museums, and historic sites.

p. 67 Neighborhood Center District
- Tree Canopy- also provide by “
landscaped parking lot islands

p. 73 Community/Regional Commercial District
- Public Transportation – add that “Internal sidewalks” should
connect directly with transit stops.
- Tree Canopy – also provided by “
developer required private landscaped areas and buffers

p. 76 Employment Center District
- Tree Canopy – also provided by “
developer required private landscaped areas and buffers

p. 82 Rural Areas District
- Tree Canopy – also provided by “
hedgerows, windbreaks, riparian and property buffers

p. 82 Fentress District
- Tree Canopy – also provided by “
hedgerows, windbreaks, riparian and property buffers

p. 88 Conservation District

- draft states that “District is rarely activated with people” and “Lands are minimally experienced by residents at minor access points.”   However the Conservation District includes the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge which is open to the public via the Portsmouth Ditch for hiking/biking, the Feeder Ditch Canal by canoe or kayak, and from Suffolk; the Northwest River Natural Area Preserve which is accessible by small boat; and the Cavalier Wildlife Management Area accessible by permit for hunting and nature related activities (such as bird watching).   Perhaps edit to say that these “permitted areas are activated with people for nature-related activities such as hiking, biking, paddling, fishing, hunting, etc.   These are all areas with potential for nature-based tourism.

p. 98 Connectivity and Infrastructure – Biking, Walking, and Trails

- please define what is included in “active transportation facilities”, i.e. bikeways (like bike lanes and protected bike lanes), paths, bike parking, wayfinding, traffic management and safe intersection design.  Not all users of this document will understand that these facilities are more than just bike paths.

p. 137 Stormwater Treatment and Green Infrastructure

- the text talks about “treating stormwater” but never clearly makes the connection of what is meant by treatment.  Please provide clarifying information for those who are not familiar with this industry buzz word.  Perhaps modify the text to say “Green infrastructure includes treating stormwater to remove pollutants such as sediment, fertilizer, and bacteria to improve water quality before it is discharged into our waterways.  Best management practices in green infrastructure may include wetlands, rain gardens (plantings specifically engineered to capture stormwater and thrive in various conditions), tree canopy, permeable pavement (pavement which lets water through to the soil for absorption), green roofs, and more.

p. 166 Growth Management and Rural Areas – Rural Areas
- the text accurately points out that the area is attractive for “leisure walking and biking”.  Long-distance “backroad biking” is a popular activity and is a form of agritourism that support bicycle outfitters, tours, and hospitality business like B&B’s, restaurants, and breweries/restaurants (for that end of ride refreshment).  Another agritourism activity in rural areas is bird watching.  Rural farm fields are prime locations for birding in various seasons in search of species like snow geese, cattle egrets, ibis, kestrels, and large flocks of red-winged blackbirds.  The U.S. cycle tourism market size was estimated at $29 billion in 2024.  
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-cycle-tourism-market-report Birding tourism is a $17 billion market in U.S. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/birdwatching-tourism-market-report


Positive Content in Draft

The draft describes a strong vision for creating a high-quality future for the City that is proactive about developing necessary infrastructure, protects green and open space, works to connect people, and respects the unique character of different parts of the City.   The policies presented adopt the principles of Smart Growth, focus on moving people on Complete Streets that provide safe access to all, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users. It includes good policies related to the environment, resilience, and supporting rural areas.    There are a great many excellent features and policies included in the draft plan. 

Below are select positive features in the plan that we wish to particularly recognize.

The opening pages of the document do a very good job of laying out the Guiding Principles (p. 10), Smart Growth (pp. 11-13), and defining Priorities (p. 24).  These priorities are:

  • Walkability, and specifically sidewalks
  • Schools
  • Balancing growth and infrastructure
  • Protecting open space/green space

Something new for Chesapeake in the Plan is the description of Character Districts (pp. 54-88) that describes a range of appropriate uses in different types of communities that exist across the City.  The Character Districts defined are Low Scale Neighborhoods, Medium Scale Neighborhoods, Urban Mixed Use, Neighborhood Centers, Community Regional Commercial, Employment Centers, Production & Processing, Regional Parks, Rural, Fentress Overlay, and Conservation.  Tree Canopy and Stormwater characteristics are two aspects included in the description of each character district. A map of how parts of the City are designated under these character districts is on p. 58.

p. 57 “Small Area Plans take precedence where there is a detailed recommendation and should be considered the “stronger” policy.”

pp. 90- 100    Connectivity and Infrastructure
- a strong emphasis on “moving] people with an efficient multi-modal transportation system”, “Complete Street … designed to provide safe access for all who need to use them, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users of all ages and abilities”, “Provide a safe, efficient, and equitable active transportation network for all travelers regardless of age, income, ability, race, where they live, or how they choose to travel. The network should connect all of Chesapeake and be accessible to everyone.”, “Incorporate active transportation facilities within new developments and City projects”, providing “sidewalks [and] safe intersections.”

pp. 100-102 Transit
- setting goal to “make public transportation more appealing and more convenient.”

p. 103 Rail
– “CON 34: Acquire abandoned railroad right-of-way the City has legal claim to or that railroad companies are interested in disposing of for public use.”

p. 117 – Economic Prosperity
- “ECON11 Study and make recommendations on potential siting criteria and sample stipulations for data centers.”

pp. 130-153 Environment and Resilience
- devotes entire chapter to Protect, maintain, and improve the quality of the natural environment, While we have noted important areas that need to be improved regarding creating healthy landscapes, green infrastructure, and renewable energy, the draft presents a strong set of baseline policies to achieve this goal. 

Some highlights include wetland protections, preference for living shorelines, riparian buffer protection, adopting the HRPDC sea level rise scenarios, working to achieve Class 5 in the Community Rating System (CRS) as it relates to flood mitigation, clear presentation on the benefits of trees and the need for Urban Forestry Plan.

p. 155-157 – provides a good discussion on the projected future population growth in the City and the emphasis on minimizing suburban sprawl from overtaking our remaining rural areas.

p. 171 – Rural Character
- “GMRA23 When developing rural property for non-agricultural uses, to the greatest extent possible, preserve fences, hedgerows, tree lines, and natural vegetation to protect these landscape features during construction. Retain treed areas between roads and buildings and protect these areas during construction”

p. 174- Agricultural Economy
- “GMRA26  Work with local farmers to develop a strategy and action plan to support their businesses and potential transition towards new agricultural models including small and niche farming in the future”

p. 183/188 Housing
- “HOU6 Encourage energy efficient building practices to assist with long-term affordability of housing”
- “HOU23 Implement an energy efficiency improvement program for existing housing”

p. 201 Placemaking and Design – Community Design
- “Natural space should also be considered an amenity and planned for within housing developments. Whether that space should be programmed and activated for resident use or set aside for conservation, providing more passive benefits, depends on the individual project, and should be carefully considered.”

p. 204 Placemaking and Design – Residential Design
- “DES9 Incorporate Smart Growth Principles and Traditional Neighborhood Development practices in new development and redevelopment where appropriate to enhance quality of life and the public realm.”
- DES13 Communities in the Urban and Suburban Overlays should emphasize connection to the public right-of-way, with front entrances connected to pedestrian walkways/sidewalks”

p. 207 Placemaking and Design – Non-Residential Design
- “DES 15: Encourage more commercial development to be walkable, mixed-use, and higher intensity …”
- “DES 20: Promote interior sidewalk connections throughout commercial and mixed-use developments”
- “DES 22: Aggregate required green or open space to make it more usable and increase any environmental benefits.”

p. 207 Placemaking and Design – Compatibility
- “DES 25: Review the Zoning Ordinance as needed to reduce impacts from incompatible uses, such as improved screening, buffering, and vegetation”

p. 210 Placemaking and Design – Unique Design Considerations
- “DES 26: Whenever possible, waterfront should be retained as a community amenity with specific facilities based on the nature of the site. This includes both residential and non-residential developments”

p. 210-211 Placemaking and Design – Sensitive Environment
- Recognizes that light and noise pollution impacts both humans and wildlife.  States that  light
pollution can be limited throughout the City by choosing exterior fixtures that are not brighter than necessary, are directed towards the ground, have full cut off, and use warm tones, among other practices. Recognizes impact of light pollution on bird migration and that noise can cause wildlife to seek new habitat
- “DES 29: All development and City construction projects should be reviewed for impacts based on the Environmentally Sensitive Overlay and provide mitigation for those impacts or refrain from developing in those areas.”
- “DES 30: Encourage developers to reduce light pollution by limiting the brightness of exterior fixtures and promoting full cut-off fixtures when practical. Where a development will occur in a highly natural area and/or wildlife may be impacted, even greater consideration should be given to such practices.”
- “DES 31: Develop an ordinance directed towards reducing light pollution.”
- “DES 32: The City will continue to manage detrimental impacts from noise “
- “DES 33: When a development would impact existing natural areas or known habitat, consideration should be given to whether or not wildlife vehicle collisions will increase, and thus whether a dedicated wildlife crossing or other measure needs to be considered. “

p. 211 - Placemaking and Design   Transit
- “
DES 34: Direct higher commercial and residential density around future or current areas served by public transit with the greatest focus around transit hubs or transfer stations.

p. 213 - Placemaking and Design   Parking Lots
- “
DES 35: Review Zoning Districts to lower parking minimums where appropriate, and unless provided reasonable justification, require the use of structured parking in the Urban Mixed-Use Character Districts. “
- “DES 36: Encourage high-quality streetscaping for parking areas and include continuous internal pedestrian walkways. “

p. 213 - Placemaking and Design   Streetscape, Wayfinding, and Gateway
- “DES 43: Establish and fund a City-wide policy for the planting and maintenance of street trees. As a starting point, staff will refer to the Virginia Department of Transportation and City Landscape guidelines when designing street sections and the need for any planting of street trees”
- “DES 44: When roadway projects require the installation of public utilities or otherwise create the opportunity, appropriate landscaping should be included.”
- “DES 45: Review the street sections and related guidelines in the Public Facilities Manual for possible amendments that clarify the expectations for road design and accompanying facilities such as sidewalks, underground utilities and street trees.”

p. 233 – Quality of Life - Facilities Generally
- “QOL 5: Locate public facilities so they are easily accessible by the mode of transportation used by frequently-served customers.”

p. 246 – Quality of Life – Parks
- “QOL 31: Create multi-functional parks that store stormwater, reduce flooding, and improve water quality where appropriate”


Signed

Organizations:

Rogard Ross
President,
Friends of Indian River

Pat Quinn
President,
Cape Henry Audubon Society

Mary-Carson Stiff Executive Director, Wetlands Watch

Beth Ginter
Executive Director
Chesapeake Conservation Landscaping Council/ 
Chesapeake Bay Landscape Professional Program

Helen W. Kuhns
Executive Director
Coastal Virginia Conservancy

Trista Imrich
Owner, 
Southern Branch Nursery

Cameron Kania
Owner, 
Tidewater Compost

Citizens:

Anna C.    
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Annette T.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Barbara M.    
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Blaizen B.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

Brittni H.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

Carol W.    
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Christina T.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

David M.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Helene H.    
Chesapeake, VA 23325

James H.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Jennifer R.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Jill S.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Juliann S.
Chesapeake, VA 23320

Lee D.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Lisa K.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Mary Lou B.
Chesapeake, VA 23320

Michael J.
Chesapeake, VA 23320

Miriam G.
Chesapeake, VA 23320
     
Rebecca C.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Rebecca G.
Chesapeake, VA 23323    

Robin R.
Chesapeake, VA 23320

David C.
Virginia Beach, VA 23464

Rodney N.
Chesapeake, VA 23324

Rue W.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

Sharon K.
Chesapeake, VA 23325
   
Shirley W.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Steffanie A.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

Susan L.
Chesapeake, VA 23320    

Susan B.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Tamela L.
Chesapeake, VA 23323

Thomas K.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Vickie E.    
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Walter B.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Susan S.
Chesapeake, VA 23320    

Jayne W.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Amy W.
Chesapeake, VA 23325

Linda B. 
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Mike H.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

Catherine G.
Chesapeake, VA 23322

James C.
Chesapeake, VA 23322