Showing posts with label Topics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Topics. Show all posts

Data Center Ordinance and Policy

Update July 18: Reflecting on the recommendations coming out of last week's Planning Commission hearing, the City Council is now looking to put a temporary data center moratorium in place while work continues on the final city policy.   The City Council will consider a Resolution directing the Planning Department on this at the Tuesday, 7/21 City Council meeting (starting at 6:30 pm).   This is another opportunity to come out and let the City Council know how you want the City to deal with data centers.  

The Planning Commission on 7/8 recommended that the allowable setback distances for data centers be increased to 1320' from residential/ag property lines and 2640' from existing residences; and also reduce the allowable noise levels to 55db(c)/60db(C).  After discussion at the City Council Work Session on Tuesday 7/14,the council members expressed a desire to go ahead with closing the By-Right allowance for data centers in current city zoning but defer action on opening new areas to data centers, i.e. Fentress, or defining the setback, noise, and other policy regulations, to allow for more public meetings.   In the meantime there would be an up to 8-month moratorium on the review of any discretionary land use applications, i.e. rezonings or conditional use permits, for data centers.

The resolution being voted on at the 7/21 meeting only talks about defering the Comp Plan related policy.  It does not directly address the Ordinance Change to close the existing By-Right allowance for data centers.  That should still be going forward to the 8/18 City Council meeting


Update July 10: The Planning Commission held its public hearing on Wednesday, July 8.  In the pre-meeting, Planning reported they had received over 140 comments and emails raising concerns about data centers.  In the hearing, 26 people spoke about their concerns with the proposed ordinance.   

The Planning Commission listened thoughtfully and afterwards asked excellent questions of City Staff.  Ultimately, they understood the urgency of proceeding with the proposed change to make Data Centers a Conditional Use. But they also made multiple important amendments to address the concerns shared by so many.  The amendments advanced included increasing the allowable setback from 100' from a property and 500' from an existing residence to 1320' (1/4 mile) from the property line and 2640' (1/2 mile) from existing residences.  They also reduced the allowable low-frequency noise levels to 55 dBC at night and 60 dbC during the day, and made this noise limit applicable to all types of neighboring properties, not just residential properties.  They also made additional language changes to emphasize the importance of protecting existing communities and minimizing infrastructure impacts.   With these changes, the Planning Commission approved the proposed ordinance and policy document by a 9-0 vote.

The amendments approved by the Planning Commission significantly improve the proposed documents and address several of the concerns we raised, especially on setbacks and noise levels.  The proposal now goes forward to the City Council, with a hearing either on August 18 or 25.  It will be critical to continue to voice concerns about data centers to the City Council members in advance of their final consideration to make sure the amendments approved by the Planning Commission are not weakened during the final hearing.  

There are still several areas where the proposal can be further improved, including:

  • Noise
    • The draft ordinance should more clearly establish the steps for noise enforcement when data centers exceed permitted levels.   Current City ordinances exempt noise from HVAC systems, Backup Generators, and lawful activities in the M-1 Light Industrial, M-2 General Industrial zones, from enforcement.  
    • Criteria for modeling noise levels during plan approval are not spelled out in the policy.  If the simulation incorrectly models the equipment, the analysis will result in inaccurate noise predictions.  

  • Decommissioning Plan
    • The policy indicates a Decommission Plan should be considered during the Conditional Use process, but does not include details.  We would like to see it specify a timeframe for the safe removal of equipment and infrastructure and the return of the site to a stable and appropriate post-use condition.  If state law allows, we should consider requiring the operator to provide a bond in the event that they go bankrupt and are not financially able to decommission the site.

  • Efficiency Standards
    • The policy states an intent that data center developments should be designed to meet high standards of energy efficiency and sustainability. But no standards are defined.  We recommend that Data Centers adopt a Power Usage Effectiveness of 1.2 or better and a Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) ratio below 1.0 liters per kilowatt-hour (L/kWh) for a closed-loop cooling system. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/best-practice-guide-data-centerdesign_0.pdf

  • Coastal Virginia Commerce Park (a.k.a. FT Williams site)
    • We were surprised to learn during the Planning Commission meeting that the proposed ordinance does not apply to the Coastal Virginia Commerce Park Planned Unit Development (PUD).  The PUD document approved in 2022 sets its own zoning requirements for the 1200-acre property off Route 17 at the North Carolina border, and it states that data centers are a Permitted Use.  Data Centers in this PUD would not require a Conditional Use approval.  We support applying the same level of data center regulation in the Coastal Virginia Commerce Park as in the rest of the city.

Background: Under current zoning regulations, data centers can be built "By Right", without any City Council oversight, in any business, commercial, or industrial zoning district.   The proposed ordinance will continue to allow Data Centers to be built in Chesapeake with a Conditional Use Permit in Industrial zoning districts (M-1 and M-2) and also within the Fentress Overlay.  It establishes conditions and guidelines for granting such a Conditional Use Permit.   The proposed ordinance and policy can be found at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3783/Data-Center-Ordinance-and-Policy

The draft ordinance permits data centers by Conditional Use in the Fentress Overlay.  The associated policy document sets the preferred siting to be within 0.5 miles of existing electric transmission corridors or other suitable power sources.  While the 2045 Comp Plan states that "Industrial and commercial uses that are compatible with rural infrastructure and aesthetic and noise levels commonly produced during Fentress operations are appropriate" in the Overlay, the cumulative impacts of encouraging a “data center alley” must be considered.  The heat island effects, air and noise pollution, visual impacts, and the permanent loss of farm lands would profoundly alter the rural character of the area.   The increased setback requirements of 1320' (1/4 mile) from the property line and 2640' (1/2 mile) from existing residences approved by the Planning Commission help address these concerns.  

The original draft had considered the same low-frequency noise levels recently adopted by Prince William County with a maximum daytime noise level at 73dB(C) and a maximum nighttime level at 68 dB(C). But Prince William County Board of Supervisors adopted levels louder than recommended by their own consultants, in order not to negatively impact existing data centers; data centers which people complained about as too loud.  https://www.princewilliamtimes.com/news/supervisors-ok-compromise-noise-ordinance-aimed-at-data-centers/article_1288e464-5559-4c12-ab8f-2a28ca28d819.html .  The Planning Commission amended the allowable noise levels to 55 dBC at night and 60 dbC during the day.

Some strong areas in the draft include:
  • Plans and components required in a Conditional Use Permit Application
  • Back-up Power Generator restrictions
  • Lighting Standards
  • Landscaping and Buffering Standards
For background information and reference, see our 2025 Data Center Fact Sheet


Comp Plan Environmental Summary

See the full 2045 Comp Plan at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3275/2045-Comprehensive-Plan 

See the Chesapeake Sustainability Network comments on the plan at https://www.greeningchesapeake.com/2025/07/chesapeake-comp-plan.html

See local area plans at https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/564/Long-Range-Planning-Policy

Jump to Plan Policy Overview:

  • Connectivity - Complete Streets, Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity, Public Transit
  • Infrastructure: Utilities
  • Economic Prosperity: Underperforming Commercial Properties, Data Centers, Brownfields
  • Environment and Resilience: Wetlands, Living Shorelines, Riparian Buffers, Green Infrastructure, Sea Level Rise, Flooding, Environmental Justice, Trees, Wildlife Habitat, Waste Reduction, Energy Policy
  • Growth Management and Rural Areas: Agricultural and Environmental Sensitive Land, Redirect Higher Density Development
  • Housing: Energy Efficiency, Affordability
  • Placemaking: Preserve developments’ natural spaces, Encourage walkable, mixed-use, and people-oriented development, Light Pollution, Noise Pollution, Parking Minimums, Wildlife Crossing, Streescaping and Landscaping, Native Plants
  • Quality of Life: Natural Amenities, Parks, Water Access
Connectivity

CON 1: The City will move people with an efficient multi-modal transportation system that reflects the local users and development patterns.

CON 3: Consider the priorities of automobiles, cyclists, and pedestrians when designing roadways based on the land use and development patterns and the user needs and preferences.

CON 4: Make connections between streets and neighborhoods to improve safety, efficiency, and community design. Avoid culde-sacs where possible.

CON 6: Develop a Complete Streets policy, which will look different across different areas of the City and under different development circumstances.

Complete Streets: This is an approach to transportation planning that provides streets that are safe, comfortable, and accessible for all users regardless of age and ability. There is no single design for complete streets; each one is unique and responds to its community context. A complete street may include sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use paths, dedicated bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops and shelters, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, and more. A complete street in a rural area will look different from a complete street in an urban area, but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road.

CON 7: Adopt a traffic safety plan that sets a goal to reduce/eliminate traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries. 

CON 14: Invest in an interconnected, alternative transportation network throughout the City.

CON 15: Develop a multi-modal hub policy to set goals to provide equitable connections for micromobility, transit, active transportation, and roadway users.

CON 16: Provide a safe, efficient, and equitable active transportation network for all travelers regardless of age, income, ability, race, where they live, or how they choose to travel. The network should connect all of Chesapeake and be accessible to everyone.

CON 17: Implement the Trails & Connectivity Plan to develop an integrated active transportation network and to design active transportation facilities

CON 18: Incorporate active transportation facilities within new developments and City projects, particularly when connections can be made to the following: existing or future Trails & Connectivity facilities, existing and future neighborhoods, commercial areas, open spaces, waterways and water access points, public facilities (schools, libraries, community centers, etc.), transit routes, and regional and national trail networks.

CON 19: Consider active transportation facilities in the design of all future roadway improvements, both public and private, based upon location, destination, context and their proximity to a facility depicted on the Trails & Connectivity Plan.

CON 20: If a roadway connection is not feasible, encourage active transportation connections between private developments.

CON 21: Use public utility corridors and infrastructure easements for active transportation facilities when feasible.

CON 22: Develop a safety campaign that educates all users on appropriate use of roadways and other facilities.

CON 23: Encourage additional bicycle infrastructure in new developments.

CON 24: Prioritize closing existing sidewalk gaps and installing crosswalks that create connections to schools, parks, senior activity centers, transit stops, and other pedestrian generators. 

CON 25: Provide and maintain sidewalks giving priority to projects based on the City’s Sidewalk Project Evaluation Guide. 

CON 26: During the site plan review process, require sidewalk installation on all existing and proposed road frontages in the Urban and Suburban Overlay districts as development and redevelopment occurs. 

CON 27: Applicants should proffer and/ or staff should stipulate the installation of new sidewalks or improvement of existing, substandard sidewalks that create connections between communities and key destinations such as schools, retail, parks, public transportation, and City services. 

CON 28: Include safe intersection crossing and necessary public improvements when designing sidewalk connections.

CON 29: Encourage increased development along public transportation routes to both serve more residents and bolster the use of such services. 

CON 30: Work with HRT to review existing and potential transit stops in order to maximize ridership and understand the barriers to their success. Prioritize and create safe connections between public transportation stops and activity centers. 

CON 31: As development occurs along existing or proposed transit lines, set aside required space and build required infrastructure to support HRT installation of standard bus stops, passenger amenities, and micromobility corrals. 

CON 32: Continue to work with HRT to assess the feasibility of high-capacity transit based on existing and future anticipated land use conditions. 

CON 33: Evaluate demand responsive services, like microtransit, as an option to fill in public transit gaps, particularly in suburban and rural areas where fixed-route service is not feasible.

CON 36: Acquire abandoned railroad right-of-way the City has legal claim to or that railroad companies are interested in disposing of for public use.

Infrastructure

INF 2: Encourage and facilitate utilities being located or moved underground, particularly when work is being done near existing utilities

INF 3: Prioritize areas of visual importance for retroactive undergrounding utility projects.

INF 6: Coordinate with utility providers to plan for future utility corridor and infrastructure expansions.

INF 9: Apply additional scrutiny and require additional hydrology information as needed when a proposed development would likely alter hydrology (such as borrow pits).

INF 10: Review volumetric capacity and request additional information as needed when a proposed development may consume large amounts of water and potentially impact the flow of water in the City’s distribution system.

Economic Prosperity

ECON 6: Prioritize repositioning large underperforming commercial properties, such as shopping malls, into mixed-use developments that increase pedestrian activity.

ECON 11: Study and make recommendations on potential siting criteria and sample stipulations for data centers.

ECON 19: Identify and assess the viability of existing brownfields for cleanup and reuse.

Environment and Resilience

ENV 1: Protect, maintain, and improve the quality of the natural environment and increase the opportunities for green infrastructure and nature-based solutions, while also protecting residents and structures from natural hazards.

ENV 2: Protect wetlands in all future development to the maximum extent practicable; developers should provide information on the purpose and need of wetlands impacts, avoidance and minimization measures taken during design to avoid wetland impacts, and what wetland mitigation options are being considered to provide no net loss of wetlands function and value. 

ENV 3: Living shorelines are the preferred method for stabilizing eroding shorelines and must be the first design alternative considered for shoreline projects. Project managers should refer to the Comprehensive Coastal Resource Management Guide prepared by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science for further direction on preferred shoreline design. 

ENV 4: Protect riparian vegetation, particularly where continuous stretches can be maintained, and preserve natural topography, providing opportunities for vegetation to migrate and adapt landward as sea levels rise. 

ENV 5: Partner with non-profit and academic organizations to identify sites where wetlands rehabilitation and restoration are possible.

ENV 6: Protect water bodies that are sources of drinking water from potential contamination. 

ENV 7: Establish and maintain an adequate vegetated buffer around all source waters. 

ENV 8: Maintain a water source protection plan. 

ENV 9: Avoid land uses that can potentially contaminate the City’s source waters. When necessary, these land uses should be placed away from bodies of water and have significant vegetated buffers and other protections. 

ENV 10: Work with the Virginia Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Quality to proactively monitor groundwater and to develop strategies to address concerns.

ENV 11: Adopt and follow design standards for drainage facilities that reflect best available science and data, which indicate a need for more stringent requirements based on the impacts of storm events as they presently occur and are expected to occur in the future. 

ENV 12: During the development review process, limit pavement and other impervious surface that does not serve a necessary purpose in the development. 

ENV 13: Promote green infrastructure other than stormwater retention ponds as a means of managing stormwater. The larger and more complex a project, the more consideration should be given to treatment trains, wetlands bioretention, and other creative stormwater solutions. 

ENV 14: Design stormwater management facilities to provide additional benefits beyond stormwater treatment and retention, such as wetlands ecosystems, wildlife habitat and recreation. 

ENV 15: Encourage piped stormwater management over ditches when reasonable to reduce stormwater maintenance requirements for the City.

ENV 16: Identify locations where regional stormwater management facilities are necessary or beneficial and proactively construct those facilities in coordination with developers as feasible.

ENV 17: Plan for the following anticipated future sea level rise scenarios as recommended by the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission: 
  • 1.5 feet of SLR for near-term planning, occurring by 2050 
  • 3.0 feet of SLR for medium-term planning, represented by the timeframe 2050–2080 
  • 4.5 feet of SLR for long-term planning relevant to timeframes beyond year 2080 
ENV 18: Direct development towards higher ground to the greatest extent practicable while discouraging development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. No new critical infrastructure should be built where there is an anticipated sea level rise impact that would occur in the lifespan of the facility unless required by the nature of the infrastructure. 

ENV 19: Consider flood risk when reviewing new developments and work with developers to minimize risk.

ENV 20: Achieve Class 5 in the Community Rating System (CRS), particularly through preserving open space in the floodplain, preserving wetlands, maintaining drainage systems and completing mitigation activities for buildings within the floodplains

ENV 21: Work with communities anticipated to be affected by sea level rise to proactively adapt to future conditions through implementation of Resilient Area Plans. 

ENV 22: Develop a program to assist homeowners in flood-prone areas in making their homes more resilient to flooding. 

ENV 23: Utilize a variety of flooding adaptation strategies that are both structural and non-structural and meet the definition of “no adverse impacts”. 

ENV 24: Review and revise as necessary the Floodplain Management section of the City Code to appropriately mitigate flooding risk to citizens. 

ENV 25: Plan future landscaping and other vegetation to reflect anticipated future conditions, particularly in the Special Flood Hazard Area. 

ENV 26: New City facilities located outside of storm surge and flood zones should be considered and, if appropriate, designed to serve the community as emergency shelters. 

ENV 27: Protect new and existing public and private infrastructure and facilities from hazards by prioritizing site selection, followed by construction and other protective or mitigation techniques. 

ENV 28: Implement hazard awareness and risk reduction principles into the City’s daily activities and processes to promote life safety during hazardous events, and to enhance community-wide understanding and awareness of community hazards.

ENV 29: Maintain a disaster response and recovery plan that describes recovery efforts during, immediately following, and postevent.

ENV 30: Identify environmental justice populations that are underserved by tree canopy and prioritize them for future plantings. Encourage new developments and redevelopments in these areas to go above and beyond ordinance-required landscaping requirements. 

ENV 31: Identify areas experiencing the Urban Heat Island effect and develop strategies to mitigate impacts. 

ENV 32: Develop and adopt an Urban Forestry Plan that includes inventorying existing trees and sets guidance on enhancing and restoring urban forest quality through age and species diversification, among other tasks and policies. 

ENV 33: When verges are included in development, they should be of sufficient width for healthy tree planting and future tree growth. 

ENV 34: Proactively monitor and remove tree pests, particularly those that are likely to have wide-ranging impacts on the entire tree canopy.

ENV 35: Preserve and maintain existing healthy mature trees, while also supplementing with public and private reforestation efforts to promote a healthy and diverse tree canopy across the City.

ENV 36: Update the City’s landscaping and buffering ordinance to include additional invasive species on the “Undesirable Tree Species” list, and clarify the planting of which cannot contribute to required landscaping. 

ENV 37: Encourage opportunities for additional tree plantings in appropriate natural environments as part of the development review process. 

ENV 38: Adopt an ordinance establishing a tree canopy fund for the purposes of collecting fees from developers that cannot provide their canopy requirements on site and using them to plant trees elsewhere in the City. 

ENV 39: Educate residents and officials about the negative impacts of invasive species, and implement programs for their strategic, targeted removal. 

ENV 40: Connect residents and businesses to existing resources on tree care and maintenance, and work with neighborhood groups to support their local tree canopy goals.

ENV 41: Identify and highlight historic, champion, and significant trees within local communities to increase likelihood of protection and maintenance.

ENV 42: Work with developers to protect green space that could serve as habitat or part of a contiguous wildlife corridor during the development process, prioritizing this land to satisfy landscaping and tree canopy requirements. 

ENV 43: Partner with environmental organizations to fund water quality and aquatic habitat projects, particularly in conjunction with industrial users. 

ENV 44: Support the acquisition of properties that expand wildlife habitat and protect migration patterns.

ENV 45: Work with regional partners to ensure long-term solutions for safe, sustainable, efficient solid waste disposal. 

ENV 46: Continue to implement strategic solutions that allow for residents and businesses to continue recycling

ENV 47: Develop and implement a waste reduction strategy with education and pilot programs to help reduce waste going to the landfill.

ENV 48: Develop a City energy policy that includes renewable energy and energy efficiency goals and a mechanism for publicly reporting energy use. 

ENV 49: Encourage the use of solar panels on top of buildings and in other unused or underutilized spaces such as parking lots. 

ENV 50: Model renewable energy usage in the City by proactively installing renewable energy throughout public areas, such as solar panels in City parking lots. 

ENV 51: Support Electric Vehicle technology and review City codes and ordinances that may need to be amended to allow the implementation of EV infrastructure.

Growth Management and Rural Areas

GMRA 1: Prioritize the protection of agricultural and environmentally sensitive land by limiting development in those areas, and also encouraging development in more suitable areas to minimize suburban sprawl.

GMRA 2: Support and focus density in a few strategic areas of the City as indicated in Character Districts and Overlay Districts and prioritize infrastructure improvements needed to support that density.

GMRA 4: Evaluate the existing requirements for a Planned Unit Development in the Urban Overlay District to make creating such developments more feasible.

GMRA 5: Develop a Transfer of Development Rights program to ensure density occurs in the parts of the City where it is most appropriate, and rural landowners are compensated for preventing development of their land.

GMRA 6: Achieve a pattern of compatible land use and growth that is balanced between uses and follows a logical pattern without “leap frogging” to parts of the City unserved by appropriate utilities and infrastructure.

GMRA 8: Review the Zoning Ordinance and make necessary changes to implement the “Reinvest and Preserve” development strategy in which housing, commercial, and industrial land use densities are slightly increased to preserve open space, create pockets of density, and increase community desired outcomes such as walkability.

GMRA 15: Assess the Zoning Ordinance for any regulations that should be in place to protect agriculture, such as buffers from incompatible uses, as well as opportunities to find flexibility in standards for typical rural- and agriculture-related uses in the Rural Overlay, where conditions may necessitate different requirements.

GMRA 17: Give special consideration to the unique recreation needs of rural residents, and continue to plan for the equine community. 

GMRA 18: Support and expand tools such as the Open Space and Agriculture Preservation (OSAP) and the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) programs to protect agriculture, open spaces, and rural landscapes. 

GMRA 19: Develop an ordinance to allow for farming villages, a unique style of development that allow for residences while protecting large tracts of agricultural land.

GMRA 20: Preserve essential elements of rural character including distant views of the countryside, topography, natural drainage patterns, country roads, open space including agricultural fields and pastures, fences and hedgerows, barns and other farm buildings.

GMRA 22: Encourage developers to construct cluster subdivisions rather than piano key development, taking care to minimize visual impact and preserve natural features.

GMRA 24: When developing rural property for non-agricultural uses, to the greatest extent possible, preserve fences, hedgerows, tree lines, and natural vegetation to protect these landscape features during construction. Retain treed areas between roads and buildings and protect these areas during construction.

Housing

HOU 6: Encourage energy efficient building practices to assist with long-term affordability of housing.

HOU 7: Review the Zoning Ordinance for amendments that allow for smaller unit and lot size in appropriate zoning districts

HOU 8: Support the development of multifamily housing that includes five or more units.

HOU 10: Support the development of missing middle housing, and consider Zoning Ordinance amendments that are needed to allow for these housing types.

HOU 17: Encourage the adaptive reuse of existing non-residential buildings for residential use where appropriate.

HOU 22: Expand and promote the real estate tax abatement and grant programs to provide additional incentives for low-income homeowners to improve their homes, and encourage adaptive rehabilitation/reuse of historic structures.

HOU 23: Implement an energy efficiency improvement program for existing housing.

HOU 40: Provide and fund housing rehabilitation programs that assist senior homeowners to repair, modernize, and improve the energy efficiency of their homes, and remove barriers to aging in place.

Placemaking

DES 3: Preserve developments’ natural spaces for community use or conservation, whichever is appropriate.

DES 12: Support decreased lot sizes and flexibility of lot alignment when it will protect sensitive environmental features and not increase the overall density that would be allowed on the tract or be directly incompatible with surrounding uses.

DES 13: Emphasize connection to the public right-of-way in Urban and Suburban Overlays communities, with front entrances connected to pedestrian walkways and sidewalks.

DES 15: Encourage more walkable, mixed use, and higher intensity commercial development, particularly in areas of the City near existing or proposed Employment Centers in the Suburban and Urban Overlay Districts.

DES 17: Implement form-based code in areas of City where it is most impactful, particularly areas that should be walkable, mixed-use, and people-oriented.

DES 20: Promote interior sidewalk connections throughout commercial and mixed-use developments.

DES 21: Encourage developers to provide reciprocal access between commercial and mixed-use developments in order to enhance connectivity, prioritizing the consolidation of existing vehicle access points and limiting new vehicle access points.

DES 22: Aggregate required green or open space to make it more usable and increase environmental benefits.

DES 29: Review all development and City construction projects for impacts based on the Environmentally Sensitive Overlay and provide mitigation for those impacts or refrain from developing in those areas.

DES 30: Encourage developers to reduce light pollution by limiting the brightness of exterior fixtures and promoting full cut-off fixtures when practical. Where a development will occur in a highly natural area or where wildlife may be impacted, even greater consideration should be given to such practices. 

DES 31: Develop an ordinance directed towards reducing light pollution. 

DES 32: Ensure the City continues to manage detrimental impacts from noise.

DES 33: When a development would impact existing natural areas or known habitat, consideration should be given to whether or not wildlife-vehicle collisions will increase, and thus whether a dedicated wildlife crossing or other measure needs to be considered.

DES 34: Direct higher commercial and residential density around future or current areas served by public transit with the greatest focus around transit hubs or transfer stations.

DES 35: Review Zoning Districts to lower parking minimums where appropriate, and unless provided reasonable justification, require the use of structured parking in the Urban Mixed-Use Character Districts.

DES 36: Encourage high-quality streetscaping for parking areas and include continuous, visible, internal pedestrian walkways.

DES 37: Use parking lots as an opportunity to create treed and vegetated areas, capturing stormwater runoff and aggregating required landscaping into usable space where plants can thrive, as opposed to only building small parking islands.

DES 39: Encourage developers to include enhanced landscaping in their projects as a way to create unique places and a sense of community pride.

DES 40: Ensure the City sets the tone for landscaping by going above the minimum code-required efforts on City-owned property that residents and customers often frequent.

DES 41: Identify existing major roadways and medians for enhanced landscaping and streetscape treatment and require landscaping in strategic future roadway projects. 

DES 42: Encourage the use of native plantings and conservation landscaping in public and private projects.

DES 44: Establish and fund a citywide policy for the planting and maintenance of street trees. As a starting point, staff will refer to the Virginia Department of Transportation and City Landscape guidelines when designing street sections and the need for any planting of street trees.

DES 45: Include appropriate landscaping when roadway projects require the installation of public utilities or otherwise create the opportunity

DES 46: Review the street sections and related guidelines in the Public Facilities Manual for possible amendments that clarify the expectations for road design and accompanying facilities, such as sidewalks, underground utilities, and street trees.

DES 47: Promote the use of wayfinding and signage in key areas that reflect the unique character of each area. Invest in wayfinding that functions at both pedestrian and vehicular levels.

PLC 6: Inventory and evaluate vacant lots and large parking areas that can be used by neighborhoods for gathering and beautification, and work with residents to activate those spaces.

PLC 7: Extend the scope of traditional land banking activities to include the creation of public spaces that provide opportunities for residents to gather, particularly where such places are scarce.

PLC 26: Continue to support tourism marketing strategies that highlight Chesapeake’s historic resources, birds and wildlife, green space, and other attractive attributes.

Quality of Life

QOL 2: Design and landscape sustainable City facilities so they are a landmark of the community, are accessible for all, and provide community spaces as needed.

QOL 24: Build on Chesapeake’s existing natural amenities and recreational assets to provide a parks and recreation system that serves all of Chesapeake’s population with a variety of facilities and programs.

QOL 28: Determine where public access to the water is needed, and develop a plan to acquire it and provide amenities such as boat ramps and kayak and canoe launches.

QOL 31: Create multi-functional parks that store stormwater, reduce flooding, and improve water quality where appropriate.

See also the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Master Plan: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3460/PRT-Master-Plan





Earth Month Chesapeake 2026

 


Calendar of Events

  • Saturday, March 28 - Great American Cleanup
  • Saturday, April 4 - Flowers and Ferns Walk
  • Saturday, April 4 - Greenbrier Parkway Cleanup
  • Saturday, April 11 - Chesapeake Recycles Day 
    • Western Branch High School, 9 am to Noon
    • GFL, Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA), and Shred-It are partnering with us to collect a wide variety of items at each of our events. In general, accepted items will include electronics (e-waste), household hazardous waste, and sensitive documents.  Also collecting Child Safety Seats for re-use. 
    • https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/1089/Chesapeake-Recycles-Day
  • Saturday, April 11 - Indian River Park Second Saturday Hike
    • Indian River Park, 8:30 am to 10 am
    • Learn about the history of the park, the native trees and plants in this century old forest on the Indian River flood plain, and its value to maintaining the health of local butterfly, bird, and wildlife populations.
    • More Info: https://www.friendsofindianriver.org/p/calendar.html
  • Saturday, April 11th -  Sam's Circle and Sentinel Drive Clean Up   
  • Friday, April 13 – Thursday, April 19 - Chesapeake C.A.R.E.S. Cleanup  Challenge
    • City Departments Cleanup Challenge (City Departments Only)
  • Saturday,  April 18 - Friends of Indian River Adopt-a-Park
  • Saturday, April 18 - Spring Migration Bird Walk
    • Cancelled
  • Saturday, April 18 - Earth Day Festival
  • Sunday, April 19 - The Lorax Movie  -“Speak for the Trees” 
  • Tuesday, April 21 - Earth Day Proclamation at City Council
    • City Council Chambers, Chesapeake City Hall, 306 Cedar Rd, 6:30 pm
    • We would love to see the City Council Chamber filled with people who care for the environment.  Wear your favorite environmental t-shirt, or something green or blue, and join us to stand up for a Greener Chesapeake!
    • This will be at the start of the agenda and should be complete by 7 pm.  
    • Location: City Hall, 306 Cedar Road, Chesapeake, VA 23322
    • Let us know you are coming by signing up at  https://forms.gle/7KxNbi7W1eiho75s6
  • Wednesday, April 22 - The BIG Tree Tour
  • Wednesday, April 22 - CEIC Earth Day Open House
  • Wednesday, April 22 - Green Drinks Chesapeake
    • Chesapeake Arboretum, 6 pm - 8 pm
    • Our next Green Drinks falls on Earth Day and we're doing something different. We will gather at the Chesapeake Arboretum. Bring a camp chair and your favorite NON-alcoholic beverage (this is a City park), and enjoy the evening with folks who care about the Earth and a greener Chesapeake. 
    • Location: 624 Oak Grove Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320. 
    • We're going to order pizza, so to know how much to order, please RSVP at https://forms.gle/pa6NKcV1S8jJWLRb6
    • More Info: https://www.greeningchesapeake.com/p/green-drinks-chesapeake.html
  • Friday, April 24-Saturday,  April 25 - Master Gardener Plant Sale
  • Saturday, April 25 - Fix-It-Fair
    • Western Branch Community Center, 10 am to 2 pm
    • Repair, Reuse, Recycle! Bring your textiles, jewelry, small appliances or furniture, and bicycles to be fixed for free, and save it from the landfill! We can’t guarantee it will be fixed, but we will try!
    • More Info: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3750/Earth-Month
  • Saturday, April 25 - Trash Can Painting Contest
    • Western Branch Park - Basketball Courts, Noon to 3 pm
    • Come help beautify our parks with a fun trash can painting contest! After the event, photos of the trash can designs will be posted to the Chesapeake Parks, Recreation and Tourism Facebook page where you can vote by “reacting” to your favorites. Winning entries will receive a prize pack!
    • More Info: https://www.cityofchesapeake.net/3750/Earth-Month
  • Sunday, April 26 - Waterway Market at Great Bridge Village 
  • Monday, April 27 - Environmental Wins Town Hall
    • Join Virginia LCV, Climate Action Virginia, local General Assembly Delegates, and partners as we hold a town hall in celebration of environmental wins this General Assembly and Earth Day.
    • 6 pm to 7:30 pm, more info at https://www.mobilize.us/lcvva/event/934570/
  • Saturday, May 2 - Clean the Bay Day ** New Date **
  • All Month - Throwing Shade - Native Tree and Shrub Discount  
  • All Month - Lights Out Hampton Roads
    • As part of this voluntary program, the Cape Henry Audubon Soceity and its partners urge property managers, businesses, tenants, government agencies, and residents help to prevent night-time bird collisions with building by turning off and/or blocking as many external and internal building lights at workplaces as possible at night during the spring migration to help prevent injury and death of migrating birds, especially from 11 pm to sunrise.   Learn how you can help at https://www.birdsafehr.org/
  • Every Friday - Friday Farmers Market


General Assembly 2026

 

This is a roundup of some of the Environmental Bills at General Assembly that we're tracking.  Overall, the Virginia League of Conservation Voters is tracking 136 Bills at https://valcv.org/2026-bill-tracking/

Key budget items related to environmental issues highlighted by the Virginia Conservation Network related to VCAP Funding, RGGI, Data Centers, PFAS, and State Park : https://app.glueup.com/view-in-browser/6269:469712:82e083d8-b1b9-487a-8db0-a60c3947b046

Links below go to the https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-search

RGGI: HB397 Direct DEQ to establish auction program (rejoining RGGI) - Passed House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 920 (effective 7/1/2026).

Trees: HB549 strengthen canopy requirements, amended to be less stringent - passed House (64‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (24‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 626 (effective 7/1/2026).

Invasive Species: HB88 – not plant and remove along highways; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 63 (effective 7/1/2026). HB109 close commercial viability loophole; adds phase out period for any such plant commercially propagated in Virginia; passed House (96‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 66 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB89 permit local service district to control invasive species - Passed Senate  (38‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House (92‑Y 6‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 130 (effective 7/1/2026).

Data Centers: HB155 SCC would have to permit facilities > 25 MW; Left in Labor and Commerce HB507 limit CO2 emissions from backup generators; set emission limits for generators; passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (25‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 397 (effective 7/1/2026). HB897 - require renewable energy to get tax credits; passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Passed by indefinitely in S-Finance and Appropriations committee (15‑Y 0‑N).  SB465 - require renewable energy to get tax credits; Left in Finance and Appropriations; SB339 allocate cost of transmission infrastructure; Directs the State Corporation Commission to conduct proceedings to review cost allocation among different customer classifications for certain electric utilities; passed Senate (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate LC Subcommittee #3 recommends continuing to 2027 (Voice Vote); HB496 disclose water usage; passed House (74‑Y 23‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate with substitute (25‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (78‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 623 (effective 7/1/2026). HB589 water usage; Left in Committee Agriculture Chesapeake and Natural Resources HB153 noise assessment - passed House (90‑Y 7‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (26‑Y 14‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (93‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 567 (effective 7/1/2026). SB94 restrict data centers to Industrial Zoning; subsitute now requires noise assessment as in HB153; passed Senate (21‑Y 18‑N 1‑A); Passed House with substitute (80‑Y 14‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (91‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 568 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB130 noise assessment; merged into SB94. HB641 Continued to 2027 in H-Finance committee;/SB393 $3/sq. ft. tax to fund Great Outdoors Act; Continued to 2027 in S-Finance and Appropriations;

Renewable Energy: HB628 ammended bill passed House  (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (22‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (97‑Y 1‑N 0‑A); SB175 strengthen standards for more small-scale solar; passed Senate (23‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendment (93‑Y 5‑N 0‑A); House amendment agreed to by Senate (23‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 645 (effective 7/1/2026); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 646 (effective 7/1/2026).  HB895 ammended bill  passed House (65‑Y 32‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (68‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 694 (effective 7/1/2026). /SB448 Energy Storage requirements; ammended bill  passed Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A);Passed House with substitute (66‑Y 33‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 695 (effective 7/1/2026). HB590  passed House (61‑Y 34‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate with substitute (23‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (64‑Y 33‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 633 (effective 7/1/2026). /SB382  streamline rooftop solar permitting; passed Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Passed House with substitute (73‑Y 26‑N 0‑A);Conference report agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (64‑Y 32‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 634 (effective 7/1/2026). HB395   ammended bill passed House (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (30‑Y 8‑N 1‑A)Senate substitute agreed to by House (93‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted /SB250 permit small solar < 1200 W; passed Senate (30‑Y 7‑N 1‑A); Passed House with substitute (96‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (29‑Y 11‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted. SB26 passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendments (75‑Y 21‑N 0‑A); House amendments agreed to by Senate (20‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 758 (effective 7/1/2026). /HB1234 allow localities to require solar over parking;  passed House (76‑Y 22‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (67‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 757 (effective 7/1/2026).

Climate Change: HB1356 adjust precipitation design standards;Continued to 2027 in H-Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources; HB1092 protection of employees from heat illness; passed House (62‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by Senate (21‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Conference report agreed to by House (61‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 731 (effective 7/1/2026).

Land Conservation: SB519 assess how to conserve 20% of land in Virginia; passed Senate (39‑Y 1‑N 0‑A); H-RUL Studies Subcommittee recommends continuing to 2027 (Voice Vote);  HB237 include floodplains in conservation mapping; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with amendment Block Vote; Senate amendment agreed to by House (99‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 915 (effective 7/1/2026). HB390 establish Habitat Policy Oversight Committee; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute Block Vote (37‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 131 (effective 7/1/2026).  HB521 – ensure no net loss of wetlands while permitting;  passed House (74‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (70‑Y 25‑N 0‑A);Approved by Governor‑Chapter 161 (effective 7/1/2026). HB889 transmission line construction to use existing ROW first;  passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 28 (effective 7/1/2026).

Housing energy efficiency HB2 passed House (65‑Y 30‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (24‑Y 16‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted. HB3 passed House (78‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate (38‑Y 2‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 540 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB5 passed Senate Block Vote (39‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House with amendment (72‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); House amendment agreed to by Senate (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A);Approved by Governor‑Chapter 541 (effective 7/1/2026).  SB72 passed Senate (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A); Passed House (64‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Governor recommends (minor) amendments; Governor's recommendation adopted.

Conservation Funding: HB70 Resilient Virginia Revolving Fund; passed House (82‑Y 16‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate (36‑Y 4‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 57 (effective 7/1/2026) HB386 Chesapeake Bay Pay for Outcomes Fund; Left in Committee Appropriations HB1038 - Virginia Student Environmental Literacy Plan Grant Fund; Left in Committee Appropriations SB420 Extreme Weather Taxpayer Protection Fund - (defeated) in committee (6‑Y 8‑N);

Fisheries: HB389 Climate adaption plan - Continued to next session; HB1048 Menhaden fishery pause; Left in Committee Agriculture Chesapeake and Natural Resources HB1049 Menhaden quotas; Left in Committee Appropriations

PFAS:  HB938 passed House (88‑Y 7‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 709 (effective 7/1/2026) HB1443 passed House  (67‑Y 29‑N 0‑A); assed Senate with substitute Block Vote (40‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (74‑Y 24‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 853 (effective 7/1/2026)SB138 passed Senate Block Vote (39‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Passed House Block Vote (95‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 710 (effective 7/1/2026). HB880 incorporated into HB 1443; HB1072  passed House (62‑Y 34‑N 0‑A);Passed Senate (23‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 933 (effective 7/1/2026) HB348  Left in Committee Appropriations

Environmental Justice: HB256 include in Comp Plans - passed House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (21‑Y 19‑N 0‑A);Senate substitute agreed to by House (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 581 (effective 7/1/2026). HB1266 public hearing notice - passed House (63‑Y 34‑N 0‑A)Passed Senate with substitute (22‑Y 18‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (65‑Y 34‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 461 (effective 7/1/2026).

Bicycles: HB661 “Idaho Stop” bikes yield at stop signs; passed House Block Vote (98‑Y 0‑N 0‑A); Reported from S-Transportation committee and rereferred to Finance and Appropriations (13‑Y 1‑N); Continued to 2027 in S-Finance and Appropriations committee (14‑Y 0‑N).  SB84 - Traffic Camera - funds to be used for projects, or programs that improve traffic safety, speed management, bicycle and pedestrian safety, public transit, and local systemic safety initiatives - passed Senate (27‑Y 11‑N 0‑A); Passed House with substitute (63‑Y 35‑N 0‑A); House substitute agreed to by Senate (22‑Y 17‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 967 (effective 7/1/2026).

Affordable Housing: HB594 - Allows a locality to authorize a zoning administrator to use an administrative process to approve rezoning applications for affordable housing developments. - passed House (89‑Y 10‑N 0‑A); Passed Senate with substitute (28‑Y 12‑N 0‑A); Senate substitute agreed to by House (81‑Y 15‑N 0‑A); Approved by Governor‑Chapter 406 (effective 7/1/2026).

Oppose

Rollback renewable energy standards: HB615 Left in Labor and Commerce, HB1031 Left in Labor and Commerce, SB40 - Passed by indefinitely in S-Commerce and Labor committee (9‑Y 6‑N)

----------------------------------

See also the Chesapeake Sustainability Network's Legislative Priorities